Incorrect quota accounting in Progress Software WSFTP Server releases prior to 2025.0.5 on Windows could allow an authenticated user with upload and delete permissions to exceed storage quotas, potentially causing denial of service.

In Progress® Telerik® Document Processing Libraries prior to version 2026.3.1027, an XML external entity reference vulnerability in SVG image processing allows an unauthenticated attacker to read local files on the server via a crafted SVG image with a nested embedded SVG, when the image is processed or exported to PDF.

In Progress® Telerik® Document Processing Libraries prior to version 2026.3.1027, a path traversal vulnerability in the Convert and Merge AI agent tools allows an authenticated attacker with low privileges who can supply tool arguments to read files outside the configured output directory, and to overwrite such files where they are writable, via relative file paths that resolve against the process current working directory.

In Progress® Telerik® Document Processing Libraries prior to version 2026.3.1027, uncontrolled recursion, infinite loop, unchecked loop condition and inefficient regular expression vulnerabilities in RadSpreadProcessing and RadSpreadStreamProcessing allow an unauthenticated attacker to terminate or hang the host process via a crafted XLSX or XLS workbook or formula.

In Progress® Telerik® Document Processing Libraries prior to version 2026.3.1027, uncontrolled recursion, infinite loop, inefficient algorithmic complexity and resource allocation vulnerabilities in RadPdfProcessing and AI document summarization and question answering allow an unauthenticated attacker to terminate or hang the host process via a crafted PDF document or document text submitted for summarization or question answering.

In Progress® Telerik® Document Processing Libraries prior to version 2026.3.1027, uncontrolled recursion, inefficient algorithmic complexity and infinite loop vulnerabilities in RadWordsProcessing allow an unauthenticated attacker to terminate or hang the host process via a crafted DOCX, DOC, RTF or HTML document.

Insufficient protection of communications in Progress WSFTP Server versions prior to 2025.0.5 could allow a network attacker to intercept sensitive information or modify requests when unencrypted connections are used.

Improper access control in Progress WSFTP Server versions prior to 2025.0.5 could allow an authenticated user with certain folder-management permissions to bypass access restrictions and access or modify files belonging to other users.

Improper neutralization of input in the sessions grid in Progress Telerik Fiddler Everywhere 8.3.0 and earlier allows an attacker to execute backend IPC commands by convincing a user to open a specially crafted SAZ file.

In WhatsUp Gold versions released before 2026.0.2, an unauthenticated remote attacker with network access to the affected service can execute arbitrary code in the context of the IIS application service account.

In Progress® Telerik® Document Processing Libraries prior to version 2026.3.1027, improper verification of cryptographic signatures and improper certificate validation in RadPdfProcessing digital signature validation allow an unauthenticated attacker to cause signature validation to report forged content as unmodified and its signing certificate as valid via a crafted signed PDF document.

Is anyone else frustrated by how long security vendors take to assess whether their products are affected by critical vulnerabilities?

CVE-2026-98432 is a recent example. Weeks after public disclosure, some vendors are still investigating whether their products are affected.

Examples:

Fortinet: https://fortiguard.fortinet.com/psirt/FG-IR-26-188 Progress/Kemp: https://community.progress.com/s/question/0D5Pb00005CbkdZKAR/is-kemp-loadmaster-affected-by-cve202698432

I understand that proper vulnerability assessments take time. But we're talking about vendors whose products are supposed to protect critical infrastructure.

Meanwhile, customers are left in the dark, potentially exposed for weeks, without knowing whether their infrastructure is vulnerable or what action to take.

How are your experiences with security vendors? Is this becoming the norm, or are some vendors handling vulnerability assessments significantly better?

Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') vulnerability in Progress DataDirect Connect for JDBC drivers, Progress DataDirect Open Access JDBC driver and Hybrid Data Pipeline allows Remote Code Inclusion.

The SpyAttribute connection option implemented by the DataDirect Connect for JDBC drivers, DataDirect Hybrid Data Pipeline JDBC driver and the DataDirect OpenAccess JDBC driver supports an undocumented syntax construct for the option value that if discovered can be used by an attacker. If an application allows an end user to specify a value for the SpyAttributes connection option then an attacker can use the undocumented syntax to cause the driver to load an arbitrary class on the class path and execute a constructor on that class.

This issue affects:

DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Amazon Redshift: through 6.0.0.001392, fixed in 6.0.0.001541

DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Apache Cassandra: through 6.0.0.000805, fixed in 6.0.0.000833

DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Hive: through 6.0.1.001499, fixed in 6.0.1.001628

DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Apache Impala: through 6.0.0.001155, fixed in 6.0.0.001279

DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Apache SparkSQL: through 6.0.1.001222, fixed in 6.0.1.001344

DataDirect Connect for JDBC Autonomous REST Connector: through 6.0.1.006961, fixed in 6.0.1.007063

DataDirect Connect for JDBC for DB2: through 6.0.0.000717, fixed in 6.0.0.000964

DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Google Analytics 4: through 6.0.0.000454, fixed in 6.0.0.000525

DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Google BigQuery: through 6.0.0.002279, fixed in 6.0.0.002410 DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Greenplum: through 6.0.0.001712, fixed in 6.0.0.001727 DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Informix: through 6.0.0.000690, fixed in 6.0.0.0851

DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Microsoft Dynamics 365: through 6.0.0.003161, fixed in 6.0.0.3198

DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Microsoft SQLServer: through 6.0.0.001936, fixed in 6.0.0.001957

DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Microsoft Sharepoint: through 6.0.0.001559, fixed in 6.0.0.001587

DataDirect Connect for JDBC for MongoDB: through 6.1.0.001654, fixed in 6.1.0.001669

DataDirect Connect for JDBC for MySQL: through 5.1.4.000330, fixed in 5.1.4.000364

DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Oracle Database: through 6.0.0.001747, fixed in 6.0.0.001776

DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Oracle Eloqua: through 6.0.0.001438, fixed in 6.0.0.001458

DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Oracle Sales Cloud: through 6.0.0.001225, fixed in 6.0.0.001316

DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Oracle Service Cloud: through 5.1.4.000298, fixed in 5.1.4.000309 DataDirect Connect for JDBC for PostgreSQL: through 6.0.0.001843, fixed in 6.0.0.001856

DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Progress OpenEdge: through 5.1.4.000187, fixed in 5.1.4.000189

DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Salesforce: through 6.0.0.003020, fixed in 6.0.0.003125 DataDirect Connect for JDBC for SAP HANA: through 6.0.0.000879, product retired

DataDirect Connect for JDBC for SAP S/4 HANA: through 6.0.1.001818, fixed in 6.0.1.001858

DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Sybase ASE: through 5.1.4.000161, fixed in 5.1.4.000162

DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Snowflake: through 6.0.1.001821, fixed in 6.0.1.001856

DataDirect Hybrid Data Pipeline Server: through 4.6.2.3309, fixed in 4.6.2.3430

DataDirect Hybrid Data Pipeline JDBC Driver: through 4.6.2.0607, fixed in 4.6.2.1023

DataDirect Hybrid Data Pipeline On Premises Connector: through 4.6.2.1223, fixed in 4.6.2.1339 DataDirect Hybrid Data Pipeline Docker: through 4.6.2.3316, fixed in 4.6.2.3430

DataDirect OpenAccess JDBC Driver: through 8.1.0.0177, fixed in 8.1.0.0183

DataDirect OpenAccess JDBC Driver: through 9.0.0.0019, fixed in 9.0.0.0022

In WhatsUp Gold versions released before 2024.0.0, if the application is configured with only a single user, a SQL Injection vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to retrieve the users encrypted password.

Improper Authentication vulnerability in Progress MOVEit Gateway (SFTP modules) allows Authentication Bypass.This issue affects MOVEit Gateway: 2024.0.0.

In WhatsUp Gold versions released before 2024.0.2, an attacker can gain access to the WhatsUp Gold server via the public API.

CWE‑522: Insufficiently Protected Credentials in web services in Progress Sitefinity version from 14.0.7700 to 14.4.8152, and 15.0.8200 to 15.0.8234, and 15.1.8300 to 15.1.8335, 15.2.8400 to 15.2.8441, 15.3.8500 to 15.3.8531, and 15.4.8600 to 15.4.8630 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to obtain plain-text credentials used connect to Sitefinity Insight service. Successful exploitation requires active integration with Sitefinity Insight and non-default site configuration.

OS Command Injection Remote Code Execution Vulnerability in UI in Progress ADC Products allows an authenticated attacker with “All” permissions to execute arbitrary commands on the LoadMaster appliance by exploiting unsanitized input in a custom WAF rule file during the file upload process.

Customer Managed ShareFile Storage Zones Controller (SZC) allows an unauthenticated attacker to access restricted configuration pages. This leads to changing system configuration and potential remote code execution.

Authenticated user can upload a malicious file to the server and execute it, which leads to remote code execution.

A vulnerability exists in Progress Flowmon versions prior to 12.5.8 and 13.0.6, whereby an administrator who clicks a malicious link provided by an attacker may inadvertently trigger unintended actions within their authenticated web session.

In Progress Flowmon versions prior to 12.5.8, a vulnerability exists whereby an authenticated low-privileged user may craft a request during the report generation process that results in unintended commands being executed on the server.

OS Command Injection Remote Code Execution Vulnerability in API in Progress ADC Products allows an authenticated attacker with “All” permissions to execute arbitrary commands on the LoadMaster appliance by exploiting unsanitized input in the 'killsession' command

OS Command Injection Remote Code Execution Vulnerability in API in Progress ADC Products allows an authenticated attacker with “VS Administration” permissions to execute arbitrary commands on the LoadMaster appliance by exploiting unsanitized input in the 'aclcontrol' command

OS Command Injection Remote Code Execution Vulnerability in API in Progress ADC Products allows an authenticated attacker with “Geo Administration” permissions to execute arbitrary commands on the LoadMaster appliance by exploiting unsanitized input in the 'addcountry' command

In Progress ShareFile Storage Zones Controller versions prior to 5.12.5 and 6.0.2, an authenticated administrative user can exploit a path traversal vulnerability to read arbitrary files from the server filesystem, write files to arbitrary directories, or determine whether specific files exist on the server.

In Progress® Telerik® UI for AJAX prior to v2026.2.708, insufficient validation of the language parameter in the spell check handler may allow an attacker to influence server-side file path resolution and trigger unintended server-side requests.

In Progress® Telerik® UI for AJAX prior to v2026.2.708, the obsolete RadChart component's ChartImage.axd handler is vulnerable to unauthenticated file read and deletion of image-extension files within the application directory.

In Progress® Telerik® UI for AJAX prior to v2026.2.708, insufficient validation of content submitted to the RadEditor PDF export feature may allow an authenticated attacker to trigger server-side requests to arbitrary hosts, resulting in outbound network connections and potential exposure of Windows authentication credentials.

In Progress® Telerik® UI for AJAX prior to v2026.2.708, the internal LayoutBuilder control processes client-state XML without disabling DTD processing, allowing unauthenticated denial of service via recursive XML entity expansion.