Where
AND
-Infinity
0

Vendor Risk Score

See how red hat compares to other vendors in security performance

View Risk Score →

Software

red hat red hat enterprise linux server for power le - update services for sap solutions
35
red hat red hat enterprise linux for power, little endian - extended life cycle
34
red hat red hat enterprise linux for x86_64 - extended life cycle
34
red hat red hat enterprise linux for x86_64 - update services for sap solutions
34
red hat red hat enterprise linux for arm 64 - 4 years of updates
31
red hat red hat enterprise linux for ibm z systems - 4 years of updates
31
red hat red hat enterprise linux for arm 64 - extended life cycle
29
red hat red hat enterprise linux for ibm z systems - extended life cycle
29
red hat red hat enterprise linux for power, little endian - extended update support
29
red hat red hat enterprise linux for x86_64 - extended update support
28
red hat red hat enterprise linux server - aus
28
red hat red hat enterprise linux for arm 64
26
red hat red hat enterprise linux for arm 64 - extended update support
26
red hat red hat enterprise linux for ibm z systems - extended update support
26
red hat red hat enterprise linux for x86_64
26
red hat red hat enterprise linux for power, little endian
24
red hat red hat enterprise linux for ibm z systems
22
red hat openshift container platform
17
red hat red hat ansible automation platform
17
red hat red hat openshift container platform
17
red hat red hat codeready linux builder for arm 64 - extended update support
14
red hat red hat codeready linux builder for ibm z systems - extended update support
14
red hat red hat codeready linux builder for power, little endian - extended update support
14
red hat red hat codeready linux builder for x86_64 - extended update support
14
red hat red hat codeready linux builder for arm 64
11
red hat red hat codeready linux builder for power, little endian
11
red hat red hat codeready linux builder for x86_64
11
red hat red hat enterprise linux for power, little endian - 4 years of support
11
red hat red hat enterprise linux for x86_64 - 4 years of updates
11
red hat red hat satellite
11
red hat red hat ai inference server
10
red hat red hat codeready linux builder for ibm z systems
10
red hat red hat openshift ai
10
red hat red hat openshift container platform for arm 64
10
red hat red hat openshift container platform for ibm z and linuxone
10
red hat red hat openshift container platform for power
10
red hat advanced cluster management for kubernetes
8
red hat multicluster engine for kubernetes
7
red hat red hat enterprise linux server - tus
7
red hat multicluster engine
6
red hat multicluster global hub
6
red hat red hat enterprise linux for x86_64 - extended life cycle long life
6
red hat enterprise linux for power, little endian - extended update support
5
red hat enterprise linux server for ibm z systems
5
red hat openshift
5
red hat red hat build of keycloak
5
red hat red hat openshift service mesh
5
red hat enterprise linux server
4
red hat red hat developer hub
4
red hat red hat directory server - 4 years of updates
4
Severity
9.9
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L

A Kubernetes tenant with create permission on Console custom resources can set spec.containers.api.spec.image to an arbitrary container image. The operator deploys this image into a pod whose ServiceAccount is bound via ClusterRoleBinding to a ClusterRole granting cluster-wide get/list/watch on all Strimzi CRDs (including KafkaUsers), patch on Kafkas/KafkaRebalances, and cluster-monitoring-view. The attacker's code reads the projected SA token and gains cross-tenant Strimzi control-plane read+write access.

1 / 2
Source: MITRE
First published (updated )
Severity
9

RHTAS 1.4.4 - Release of Model Transparency 1.0.5

First published (updated )
Severity
9

RHOAI 3.4.5 - Red Hat OpenShift AI

First published (updated )
Severity
9.8
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

A flaw was found in 389 Directory Server (389-ds-base). During SASL PLAIN authentication, the idssaslcanonuser() function writes the resolved bind DN into a Cyrus SASL auxiliary property (propset) on every canonicalization attempt, including failed ones. A failed one-shot PLAIN exchange does not trigger SASL-context recreation in idssaslcheckbind() -- that only happens when CONNFLAGSASLCOMPLETE or continuing is already set. A subsequent successful SASL bind on the same connection retrieves the auxiliary property via propgetnames() and unconditionally trusts only the first stored value (dnval[0].values[0]), with no check on which SASL mechanism completed the second exchange and no check that the value corresponds to the identity actually just authenticated.

An unprivileged remote attacker can exploit this with zero valid credentials: first send a SASL PLAIN bind as cn=Directory Manager with an incorrect password (fails as expected, but leaves the Directory Manager DN in slot 0 of the auxiliary property), then complete a SASL ANONYMOUS bind on the same connection. The server installs the stale Directory Manager identity instead of the anonymous identity, granting full Directory Manager authority. This was independently confirmed by Red Hat Product Security in an isolated, network-disconnected sandbox against 389-ds-base-2.9.0: "Who Am I?" returned "cn=directory manager", and the Directory-Manager-only cn=config attribute nsslapd-rootdn became readable. The same stale-identity mechanism also allows escalation via a valid low-privileged account's own successful second bind (originally reported variant, requiring one valid account), independently reproduced against the reporter's own PoC.

Root cause: ldap/servers/slapd/saslbind.c, idssaslcanonuser() (identity write, unconditional per mechanism) and idssaslcheckbind() (identity read-back and installation, no mechanism check, no freshness check). Verified directly against commit 33c0e0115c03017ba94ee02f144383704de32a25; unchanged since a September 2024 logging-format cleanup.

1 / 2
Source: Red Hat
First published (updated )
Severity
10
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Impact Podman v4.4.0 added a feature where container checkpoints (from the podman container checkpoint command) could be distributed via OCI registry, and pulled from that registry and run via the podman run command. This allowed easy transfer of checkpoints between systems. However, checkpoints allow complete control of how the container is created - including full control of the container sandbox. When podman run detects a checkpoint, it will silently ignore all user input regarding how the container should be created - for example, podman run --cap-drop=ALL on an image that is determined to be a checkpoint will ignore --cap-drop=all and use the set of capabilities specified by the checkpoint image instead, which could include all capabilities. Podman identifies checkpoint images by looking for an annotation, io.podman.annotations.checkpoint.runtime.name. If this annotation is set, the image is treated as a checkpoint. Conflating container images and checkpoints in podman run allows inherently insecure behavior as the image can now control how it is executed. The Podman Maintainers have determined that the safest course of action is to remove this functionality.

Patch The commit introducing this functionality was reverted.

3721ff82ffb44a4ceeaecc5abd3808e924a6b669 c74b1d37b3fb834b0de43e176565d9d8c254b627 fa6cef22c2baf3987b581c673bb416ef0585daf7 (main) ea9243e04d1db3886dc3a51ee3300ffb547cfc02 450c64426dbcff1097d3c7911d791101e3d16f4c 2d05a7c61f022d4f24980ea6d307fa53da2b8692 (v6.1) 7728ba0a90094408ad9078e36c3622a651d49616 24706290d5c974f078d8ca284026802515f28e92 29c8c6e50607df7a7d735ace09ff0ea099c0b3e0 (v5.8)

Workarounds Images being pulled should be scanned for the io.podman.annotations.checkpoint.runtime.name annotation, and rejected if it is present. Podman does not presently have the ability to perform this scanning and rejection automatically.

Also not that rootless containers are not affected as they do not support checkpoint/restore at all currently.

Credits This vulnerability was discovered by ADA Logics Ltd using Anthropic's Claude models.

1 / 3
Source: GitHub
First published (updated )
Severity
9.3
SSRF
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L

A flaw was found in the OpenShift console. Unauthenticated access to the /api/devfile/ and /api/devfile/samples/ endpoints allows a remote attacker to send crafted devfile payloads. This can lead to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), where the console pod makes requests to internal services and reflects partial responses to the attacker. Additionally, by sending repeated large requests without a specified content length, an attacker can cause unbounded memory growth, leading to a Denial of Service (DoS).

1 / 2
Source: MITRE
First published (updated )
Severity
9

Critical: idm:DL1 security, bug fix, and enhancement update

First published (updated )
Severity
9

Critical: idm:DL1 security, bug fix, and enhancement update

First published (updated )
Severity
9

Critical: cjose security update

First published (updated )
Severity
9.1
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N

A flaw was found in Undertow. This vulnerability allows a remote attacker to construct specially crafted requests where header names are parsed differently by Undertow compared to upstream proxies. This discrepancy in header interpretation can be exploited to launch request smuggling attacks, potentially bypassing security controls and accessing unauthorized resources.

1 / 2
Source: MITRE
First published (updated )
Severity
9.1
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N

A flaw was found in Undertow. A remote attacker can exploit this vulnerability by sending \r\r\r as a header block terminator. This can be used for request smuggling with certain proxy servers, such as older versions of Apache Traffic Server and Google Cloud Classic Application Load Balancer, potentially leading to unauthorized access or manipulation of web requests.

1 / 2
Source: MITRE
First published (updated )
Severity
9

Critical: ipa security, bug fix, and enhancement update

First published (updated )
Severity
9

Critical: ipa security update

First published (updated )
Severity
9

Red Hat AI Inference 3.5.2 (cpu)

First published (updated )
Severity
9

Red Hat AI Inference 3.5.2 (spyre)

First published (updated )
Severity
9

Red Hat AI Inference 3.5.2 (cuda)

First published (updated )
Severity
9

Red Hat AI Inference Tech Preview 3.5.2 (Gaudi)

First published (updated )
Severity
9

Red Hat AI Inference 3.5.2 (ROCm)

First published (updated )
Severity
9

Critical: cjose security update

First published (updated )
Severity
9

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.7 Container Release Update

First published (updated )
Severity
9

Critical: redhat-ds:11 security, bug fix, and enhancement update

First published (updated )
Severity
9

Red Hat Developer Hub 1.10.5 release.

First published (updated )
Severity
9.8
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

In Jboss Application Server as shipped with Red Hat Enterprise Application Platform 5.2, it was found that the doFilter method in the ReadOnlyAccessFilter of the HTTP Invoker does not restrict classes for which it performs deserialization and thus allowing an attacker to execute arbitrary code via crafted serialized data.

1 / 3
First published (updated )
Severity
9.1
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

A flaw was found in OpenShift GitOps. Namespace admins can create ArgoCD Custom Resources (CRs) that trick the system into granting them elevated permissions in other namespaces, including privileged namespaces. An authenticated attacker can then use these elevated permissions to create privileged workloads that run on master nodes, effectively giving them root access to the entire cluster.

1 / 2
Source: MITRE
First published (updated )
Severity
9

Red Hat Developer Hub 1.10.5 Plugin Catalog GA plugins release.

First published (updated )
Severity
9

Critical: Satellite 6.19.5 Async Update

First published (updated )
Severity
9

Critical: freerdp security update

First published (updated )
Severity
9

RHOAI 3.3.7 - Red Hat OpenShift AI

First published (updated )

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203