Where
AND
AND
-Infinity
0

Vendor Risk Score

See how siemens compares to other vendors in security performance

View Risk Score →

Software

siemens acuson p300
6
siemens acuson p300 firmware
6
siemens acuson p500
6
siemens acuson p500 firmware
6
siemens acuson sc2000
6
siemens acuson sc2000 firmware
6
siemens acuson x700
6
siemens acuson x700 firmware
6
siemens syngo sc2000
6
siemens syngo sc2000 firmware
6
siemens tissue preparation system
6
siemens tissue preparation system firmware
6
siemens versant kpcr molecular system
6
siemens versant kpcr molecular system firmware
6
siemens versant kpcr sample prep
6
siemens versant kpcr sample prep firmware
6
siemens simatic s7-1500 cpu 1518-4 pn\/dp mfp firmware
4
siemens simatic s7-1500 cpu 1518f-4 pn\/dp mfp
4
siemens simatic s7-1500 cpu 1518f-4 pn\/dp mfp firmware
4
siemens simatic s7-1500 tm mfp
4
siemens simatic s7-1500 tm mfp firmware
4
siemens simatic s7-1500 cpu 1518-4 pn\/dp mfp
3
siemens siplus s7-1500 cpu 1518-4 pn\/dp mfp
3
siemens siplus s7-1500 cpu 1518-4 pn\/dp mfp firmware
3
siemens ruggedcom ape1808
2
siemens ruggedcom ape1808 firmware
2
siemens scalance lpe9403
2
siemens scalance lpe9403 firmware
2
siemens application processing engine
1
siemens application processing engine firmware
1
siemens cadra
1
siemens cp 1543-1
1
siemens cp 1543-1 firmware
1
siemens elan-8.2
1
siemens ruggedcom crossbow
1
siemens scalance xch328
1
siemens scalance xcm324
1
siemens scalance xcm328
1
siemens scalance xcm332
1
siemens scalance xrh334
1
siemens scalance xrm334
1
siemens sidis prime
1
siemens simatic ax runtime
1
siemens simatic cn 4100
1
siemens simatic cn 4100 firmware
1
siemens simatic cp
1
siemens simatic cp 1543-1
1
siemens simatic cp 1543-1 firmware
1
siemens simatic hmi mtp1000
1
siemens simatic hmi mtp1200
1
Severity
8.4
AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

A vulnerability has been identified in Siemens Software Center (All versions < V4.0.9.8). The affected application loads dynamic-link libraries (DLLs) from an uncontrolled search path. This could allow an authenticated local attacker to place a specially crafted DLL in a directory that the application searches, leading to arbitrary code execution with the privileges of the affected application.

1 / 2
Source: NVD
First published (updated )
Severity
7.8
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H

In ip6appenddata(), when the paged-allocation branch is taken (MSGMORE / NETIFFSG / large fraglen), alloclen and pagedlen are computed as

alloclen = fragheaderlen + transhdrlen; pagedlen = datalen - transhdrlen;

datalen already includes fraggap (datalen = length + fraggap). When fraggap is non-zero, this is not the first skb and transhdrlen is zero. The fraggap bytes carried over from the previous skb are copied just past the fragment headers in the new skb's linear area. The linear area is therefore undersized by fraggap bytes while pagedlen is overstated by the same amount, and the copy writes past skb->end into the trailing skbsharedinfo.

An unprivileged user can trigger this via a UDPv6 socket using MSGMORE together with MSGSPLICEPAGES.

The bad accounting was introduced by commit 773ba4fe9104 ("ipv6: avoid partial copy for zc"). Before commit ce650a166335 ("udp6: Fix ip6appenddata()'s handling of MSGSPLICEPAGES"), the negative copy value caused -EINVAL to be returned. That later commit allowed MSGSPLICEPAGES to proceed in this case, making the corruption triggerable.

The non-paged branch sets alloclen to fraglen, which already accounts for fraggap because datalen does. Bring the paged branch in line by adding fraggap to alloclen and subtracting it from pagedlen.

After this adjustment, copy no longer collapses to -fraggap on the paged path, so remove the stale comment describing that old arithmetic. Since a negative copy is no longer expected for a valid MSGSPLICEPAGES case, remove the MSGSPLICEPAGES exception from the negative copy check.

1 / 7
Source: Red Hat
First published (updated )
Severity
7.8
AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:A/AU:N/R:A/V:D/RE:M/U:Red

Authentication bypass vulnerabilities in the GlobalProtect portal and gateway of Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS® software allows the attacker to bypass security restrictions and establish an unauthorized VPN connection.

Panorama and Cloud NGFW are not impacted by these issues.

1 / 2
Source: Palo Alto Networks
First published (updated )
Severity
7.8
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

crypto: algifaead - Revert to operating out-of-place

1 / 5
Source: Microsoft
First published (updated )
Severity
8.8
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Chromium: CVE-2025-13223 Type Confusion in V8

1 / 4
Source: Microsoft
First published (updated )
Severity
7.8
Race Condition
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

crypto: afalg - Disallow concurrent writes in afalgsendmsg

1 / 3
Source: Microsoft
First published (updated )
Severity
7.2
EPSS
0.05%
SQL Injection, Input Validation, Buffer Overflow, Race Condition, Double Free, Use After Free
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Accessibility. A logic issue was addressed with improved checks.

1 / 183
Source: Apple
First published (updated )
Severity
7.5
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

HTTP/2 Rapid reset attack The HTTP/2 protocol allows clients to indicate to the server that a previous stream should be canceled by sending a RSTSTREAM frame. The protocol does not require the client and server to coordinate the cancellation in any way, the client may do it unilaterally. The client may also assume that the cancellation will take effect immediately when the server receives the RSTSTREAM frame, before any other data from that TCP connection is processed.

Abuse of this feature is called a Rapid Reset attack because it relies on the ability for an endpoint to send a RSTSTREAM frame immediately after sending a request frame, which makes the other endpoint start working and then rapidly resets the request. The request is canceled, but leaves the HTTP/2 connection open.

The HTTP/2 Rapid Reset attack built on this capability is simple: The client opens a large number of streams at once as in the standard HTTP/2 attack, but rather than waiting for a response to each request stream from the server or proxy, the client cancels each request immediately.

The ability to reset streams immediately allows each connection to have an indefinite number of requests in flight. By explicitly canceling the requests, the attacker never exceeds the limit on the number of concurrent open streams. The number of in-flight requests is no longer dependent on the round-trip time (RTT), but only on the available network bandwidth.

In a typical HTTP/2 server implementation, the server will still have to do significant amounts of work for canceled requests, such as allocating new stream data structures, parsing the query and doing header decompression, and mapping the URL to a resource. For reverse proxy implementations, the request may be proxied to the backend server before the RSTSTREAM frame is processed. The client on the other hand paid almost no costs for sending the requests. This creates an exploitable cost asymmetry between the server and the client.

Multiple software artifacts implementing HTTP/2 are affected. This advisory was originally ingested from the swift-nio-http2 repo advisory and their original conent follows.

swift-nio-http2 specific advisory swift-nio-http2 is vulnerable to a denial-of-service vulnerability in which a malicious client can create and then reset a large number of HTTP/2 streams in a short period of time. This causes swift-nio-http2 to commit to a large amount of expensive work which it then throws away, including creating entirely new Channels to serve the traffic. This can easily overwhelm an EventLoop and prevent it from making forward progress.

swift-nio-http2 1.28 contains a remediation for this issue that applies reset counter using a sliding window. This constrains the number of stream resets that may occur in a given window of time. Clients violating this limit will have their connections torn down. This allows clients to continue to cancel streams for legitimate reasons, while constraining malicious actors.

1 / 10
Source: GitHub
First published (updated )
Severity
7.8
Buffer Overflow
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

A buffer overflow was discovered in the GNU C Library's dynamic loader ld.so while processing the GLIBCTUNABLES environment variable. This issue could allow a local attacker to use maliciously crafted GLIBCTUNABLES environment variables when launching binaries with SUID permission to execute code with elevated privileges.

1 / 6
First published (updated )
Severity
7.8
Use After Free
AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

A use-after-free flaw was found in nftables cross-table in the net/netfilter/nftablesapi.c function in the Linux kernel. This flaw allows a local, privileged attacker to cause a use-after-free problem at the time of table deletion, possibly leading to local privilege escalation.

1 / 6
First published (updated )
Severity
7.8
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

A flaw was found in the way the "flags" member of the new pipe buffer structure was lacking proper initialization in copypagetoiterpipe and pushpipe functions in the Linux kernel and could thus contain stale values. An unprivileged local user could use this flaw to write to pages in the page cache backed by read only files and as such escalate their privileges on the system.

1 / 4
First published (updated )
Severity
7.8
Input Validation
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

A Local Privilege Escalation vulnerability (from any user to root) was found in polkit's pkexec, a SUID-root program that is installed by default on every major Linux distribution.

1 / 3
Source: Red Hat
First published (updated )
Severity
8.1
Input Validation
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2; Windows RT 8.1; and Windows 10 Gold, 1511, and 1607; and Windows Server 2016 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted packets, aka "Windows SMB Remote Code Execution Vulnerability." This vulnerability is different from those described in CVE-2017-0143, CVE-2017-0144, CVE-2017-0145, and CVE-2017-0146.

1 / 2
First published (updated )
Severity
8.8
Input Validation
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Microsoft Windows Server Message Block 1.0 (SMBv1) contains an unspecified vulnerability that allows for remote code execution.

1 / 2
Source: CISA
First published (updated )
Severity
7.5
Infoleak
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2; Windows RT 8.1; and Windows 10 Gold, 1511, and 1607; and Windows Server 2016 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory via a crafted packets, aka "Windows SMB Information Disclosure Vulnerability."

1 / 2
First published (updated )
Severity
8.8
Input Validation
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2; Windows RT 8.1; and Windows 10 Gold, 1511, and 1607; and Windows Server 2016 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted packets, aka "Windows SMB Remote Code Execution Vulnerability." This vulnerability is different from those described in CVE-2017-0143, CVE-2017-0144, CVE-2017-0145, and CVE-2017-0148.

1 / 2
First published (updated )
Severity
8.8
Input Validation
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2; Windows RT 8.1; and Windows 10 Gold, 1511, and 1607; and Windows Server 2016 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted packets, aka "Windows SMB Remote Code Execution Vulnerability." This vulnerability is different from those described in CVE-2017-0143, CVE-2017-0144, CVE-2017-0146, and CVE-2017-0148.

1 / 2
First published (updated )
Severity
8.8
Input Validation
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2; Windows RT 8.1; and Windows 10 Gold, 1511, and 1607; and Windows Server 2016 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted packets, aka "Windows SMB Remote Code Execution Vulnerability." This vulnerability is different from those described in CVE-2017-0143, CVE-2017-0145, CVE-2017-0146, and CVE-2017-0148.

1 / 2
First published (updated )
Severity
7.5
Input Validation
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

A vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC CP 1543-1 (All versions < V2.0.28), SIPLUS NET CP 1543-1 (All versions < V2.0.28). Under special conditions it was possible to write SNMP variables on port 161/udp which should be read-only and should only be configured with TIA-Portal. A write to these variables could reduce the availability or cause a denial-of-service.

1 / 2
First published (updated )
Severity
7.5
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

A missing bounds check was found in the way OpenSSL handled TLS heartbeat extension packets. This flaw could be used to reveal up to 64k of memory from a connected client or server.

Only 1.0.1 releases of OpenSSL are affected including 1.0.1f (and 1.0.2 betas)

The following upstream commit introduced TLS/DTLS heatbeat support and also this issue:

http://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=4817504

1 / 3
Source: Red Hat
First published (updated )

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203