Where
AND
-Infinity
0
Severity
6.5
SSRF
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

Due to incorrect host parsing, applications that rely on UriComponentsBuilder to parse and validate an externally provided URL string may be exposed to a server-side request forgery (SSRF) attack.

Affected versions: Spring Framework 7.0.0 through 7.0.7; 6.2.0 through 6.2.18.

First published (updated )
Severity
5.3
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Spring MVC and WebFlux applications are vulnerable to Multipart request smuggling attacks.

Affected versions: Spring Framework 7.0.0 through 7.0.7; 6.2.0 through 6.2.18; 6.1.0 through 6.1.27; 5.3.0 through 5.3.48.

First published (updated )
Severity
5.3
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

A vulnerability in Spring Expression Language (SpEL) evaluation logic allows for arbitrary zero-argument method invocation, even within restricted or read-only contexts, which may allow an attacker to invoke unintended application logic.

Affected versions: Spring Framework 7.0.0 through 7.0.7; 6.2.0 through 6.2.18; 6.1.0 through 6.1.27; 5.3.0 through 5.3.48.

First published (updated )
Severity
5.3
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

Spring WebFlux applications may be vulnerable to a security bypass when using the Kotlin Router DSL.

Affected versions: Spring Framework 5.3.0 through 5.3.48.

First published (updated )
Severity
6.1
XSS, Code Injection
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N

Spring MVC applications which accept user-supplied values in the cssClass, cssErrorClass, or cssStyle attributes of JSP form tags allow arbitrary HTML/JavaScript code injection, potentially resulting in a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability.

Affected versions: Spring Framework 7.0.0 through 7.0.7; 6.2.0 through 6.2.18; 6.1.0 through 6.1.27; 5.3.0 through 5.3.48.

First published (updated )
Severity
6.1
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

A Spring MVC or Spring WebFlux application which configures a mapping for "/" where the view name is not explicitly specified allows an attacker to craft a link resulting in a 302 redirect to an arbitrary external host via the redirect: prefix.

Affected versions: Spring Framework 7.0.0 through 7.0.7; 6.2.0 through 6.2.18; 6.1.0 through 6.1.27; 5.3.0 through 5.3.48.

First published (updated )
Severity
5.9
Path Traversal
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Spring MVC and WebFlux applications are vulnerable to Path Traversal attacks when resolving static resources.

Affected versions: Spring Framework 7.0.0 through 7.0.7; 6.2.0 through 6.2.18; 6.1.0 through 6.1.27; 5.3.0 through 5.3.48.

First published (updated )
Severity
5.9
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Spring MVC and WebFlux applications are vulnerable to Information Disclosure attacks when resolving static resources.

Affected versions: Spring Framework 7.0.0 through 7.0.7; 6.2.0 through 6.2.18; 6.1.0 through 6.1.27; 5.3.0 through 5.3.48.

First published (updated )
Severity
5.9
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Spring WebFlux applications are vulnerable to Denial of Service (DoS) attacks when processing multipart requests. Affected versions: Spring Framework 7.0.0 through 7.0.7, 6.2.0 through 6.2.18, 6.1.0 through 6.1.27, 5.3.0 through 5.3.48.

First published (updated )
Severity
4.2
XSS
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

A WebFlux application with a compromised subdomain (for example, compromised via cross-site scripting (XSS)) is vulnerable to an escalation attack exchanging a known session ID for that of an authenticated user.

Affected versions: Spring Framework 7.0.0 through 7.0.7; 6.2.0 through 6.2.18; 6.1.0 through 6.1.27; 5.3.0 through 5.3.48.

First published (updated )
Severity
5.3
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Spring MVC and WebFlux applications are vulnerable to Denial of Service attacks when resolving static resources.

More precisely, an application can be vulnerable when all the following are true:

the application is using Spring MVC or Spring WebFlux the application is serving static resources from the file system the application is running on a Windows platform

When all the conditions above are met, the attacker can send malicious requests that are slow to resolve and that can keep HTTP connections in use. This can cause a Denial of Service on the application.

First published (updated )
Severity
6.5
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:N

A WebFlux server application that processes multipart requests creates temp files for parts larger than 10 K. Under some circumstances, temp files may remain not deleted after the request is fully processed. This allows an attacker to consume available disk space.

Older, unsupported versions are also affected.

First published (updated )
Severity
5.9
Path Traversal
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Use of Java scripting engine enabled (e.g. JRuby, Jython) template views in Spring MVC and Spring WebFlux applications can result in disclosure of content from files outside the configured locations for script template views. This issue affects Spring Framework: from 7.0.0 through 7.0.5, from 6.2.0 through 6.2.16, from 6.1.0 through 6.1.25, from 5.3.0 through 5.3.46.

First published (updated )
Severity
5.3
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

The fix for CVE-2022-22968 made disallowedFields patterns in DataBinder case insensitive. However, String.toLowerCase() has some Locale dependent exceptions that could potentially result in fields not protected as expected.

1 / 2
Source: MITRE
First published (updated )
Severity
4.3
Input Validation
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

In Spring Framework versions 5.3.0 - 5.3.38 and older unsupported versions, it is possible for a user to provide a specially crafted Spring Expression Language (SpEL) expression that may cause a denial of service (DoS) condition.

Specifically, an application is vulnerable when the following is true:

The application evaluates user-supplied SpEL expressions.

1 / 3
Source: NVD
First published (updated )
Severity
6.5
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

A flaw found was found in Spring Framework. This flaw allows a malicious user to use a specially crafted SpEL expression that causes a denial of service (DoS).

1 / 3
First published (updated )
Severity
6.5
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

A flaw was found in Spring Framework Applications. Applications that use STOMP over the WebSocket endpoint are vulnerable to a denial of service attack caused by an authenticated user.

1 / 4
First published (updated )
Severity
4.3
Input Validation
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

In Spring Framework versions 5.3.0 - 5.3.13, 5.2.0 - 5.2.18, and older unsupported versions, it is possible for a user to provide malicious input to cause the insertion of additional log entries. This is a follow-up to CVE-2021-22096 that protects against additional types of input and in more places of the Spring Framework codebase.

1 / 3
First published (updated )
Severity
4.3
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

In Spring Framework versions 5.3.0 - 5.3.10, 5.2.0 - 5.2.17, and older unsupported versions, it is possible for a user to provide malicious input to cause the insertion of additional log entries.

1 / 2
First published (updated )
Severity
5.3
CSRF
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Spring Framework, versions 5.2.x prior to 5.2.3 are vulnerable to CSRF attacks through CORS preflight requests that target Spring MVC (spring-webmvc module) or Spring WebFlux (spring-webflux module) endpoints. Only non-authenticated endpoints are vulnerable because preflight requests should not include credentials and therefore requests should fail authentication. However a notable exception to this are Chrome based browsers when using client certificates for authentication since Chrome sends TLS client certificates in CORS preflight requests in violation of spec requirements. No HTTP body can be sent or received as a result of this attack.

First published (updated )
Severity
6.1
XSS
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

ZF2014-03 has a potential cross site scripting vector in multiple view helpers

First published (updated )
Severity
5.9
XSS
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Pivotal Spring Framework is vulnerable to cross-site tracing, caused by a flaw in the HiddenHttpMethodFilter in Spring MVC. By persuading a victim to visit a specially-crafted Web site, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause the victim's browser to invoke a TRACE request to return sensitive header information including cookies or authentication data from third-party domains.

1 / 2
First published (updated )
Severity
6.5
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

A flaw was found in Spring Framework, versions 5.0.x prior to 5.0.6, versions 4.3.x prior to 4.3.17, and older unsupported versions allows applications to expose STOMP over WebSocket endpoints with a simple, in-memory STOMP broker through the spring-messaging module. A malicious user (or attacker) can craft a message to the broker that can lead to a regular expression, denial of service attack.

References: https://pivotal.io/security/cve-2018-1257

1 / 3
Source: Red Hat
First published (updated )
Severity
5.9
Path Traversal
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Pivotal Spring Framework could allow a remote attacker to traverse directories on the system, caused by improper validation of user request. An attacker could send a specially-crafted URL request containing "dot dot" sequences (/../) to configure Spring MVC to serve static resources.

1 / 3
Source: IBM
First published (updated )
Severity
5.3
Input Validation
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Pivotal Spring Security and Spring Framework could allow a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions, caused by the failure to consider URL path parameters when processing security constraints. By adding a URL path parameter with special encodings, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to bypass access restrictions and gain access to the server and obtain sensitive information.

1 / 3
Source: IBM
First published (updated )
Severity
6.8
XEE
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P

The ZendXmlSecurity::scan in ZendXml before 1.0.1 and Zend Framework before 1.12.14, 2.x before 2.4.6, and 2.5.x before 2.5.2, when running under PHP-FPM in a threaded environment, allows remote attackers to bypass security checks and conduct XML external entity (XXE) and XML entity expansion (XEE) attacks via multibyte encoded characters.

1 / 3
First published (updated )
Severity
5.5
Buffer Overflow
AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Pivotal Spring Framework before 3.2.14 and 4.x before 4.1.7 do not properly process inline DTD declarations when DTD is not entirely disabled, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption and out-of-memory errors) via a crafted XML file.

1 / 2
Source: GitHub
First published (updated )
Severity
6.1
CRLF Injection
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

CRLF injection vulnerability in Zend\Mail (ZendMail) in Zend Framework before 1.12.12, 2.x before 2.3.8, and 2.4.x before 2.4.1 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP headers and conduct HTTP response splitting attacks via CRLF sequences in the header of an email.

1 / 2
First published (updated )
Severity
5
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N

The Java SockJS client in Pivotal Spring Framework 4.1.x before 4.1.5 generates predictable session ids, which allows remote attackers to send messages to other sessions via unspecified vectors.

First published (updated )
Severity
5
Path Traversal
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N

Directory traversal vulnerability in Pivotal Spring Framework 3.0.4 through 3.2.x before 3.2.12, 4.0.x before 4.0.8, and 4.1.x before 4.1.2 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via unspecified vectors, related to static resource handling.

1 / 2
Source: GitHub
First published (updated )

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203