Where
AND
-Infinity
0
Severity
4
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

An HTTP/2 implementation flaw allows a denial-of-service (DoS) that uses malformed HTTP/2 control frames to break the maximum concurrent streams limit (HTTP/2 MadeYouReset Attack).

First published (updated )
Severity
4
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

REXML is an XML toolkit for Ruby. The REXML gem before 3.3.6 has a DoS vulnerability when it parses an XML that has many deep elements that have same local name attributes. If you need to parse untrusted XMLs with tree parser API like REXML::Document.new, you may be impacted to this vulnerability. If you use other parser APIs such as stream parser API and SAX2 parser API, this vulnerability is not affected. The REXML gem 3.3.6 or later include the patch to fix the vulnerability.

First published (updated )
Severity
4
Buffer Overflow
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

CVE-2013-6370 Buffer overflow in the printbuf APIs in json-c before 0.12 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via unspecified vectors. CVE-2013-6371 The hash functionality in json-c before 0.12 allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via crafted JSON data, involving collisions.

First published (updated )
Severity
4
AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

A vulnerability has been found in the CPython venv module and CLI where path names provided when creating a virtual environment were not quoted properly, allowing the creator to inject commands into virtual environment "activation" scripts (ie "source venv/bin/activate"). This means that attacker-controlled virtual environments are able to run commands when the virtual environment is activated. Virtual environments which are not created by an attacker or which aren't activated before being used (ie "./venv/bin/python") are not affected.

First published (updated )
Severity
4
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

The protojson.Unmarshal function can enter an infinite loop when unmarshaling certain forms of invalid JSON. This condition can occur when unmarshaling into a message which contains a google.protobuf.Any value, or when the UnmarshalOptions.DiscardUnknown option is set.

First published (updated )
Severity
4.4
AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Exposure of a Sensitive Information vulnerability exists in the Global Server Load Balancing (GSLB) container, which may allow an authenticated attacker with administrator role privileges to view sensitive information.

1 / 2
Source: F5
First published (updated )
Severity
4.4
AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Exposure of a Sensitive Information vulnerability exists in the Global Server Load Balancing (GSLB) container, which may allow an authenticated attacker with administrator role privileges to view sensitive information.

First published (updated )
Severity
5.7
EPSS
0.04%
Buffer Overflow, XSS, SQL Injection, Input Validation, Code Injection, Race Condition
AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

A Speculative Race Condition (SRC) vulnerability that impacts modern CPU architectures supporting speculative execution (related to Spectre V1) has been disclosed. An unauthenticated attacker can exploit this vulnerability to disclose arbitrary data from the CPU using race conditions to access the speculative executable code paths.

First published (updated )
Severity
6.5
Command Injection, OS Command Injection
AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

In ssh in OpenSSH before 9.6, OS command injection might occur if a user name or host name has shell metacharacters, and this name is referenced by an expansion token in certain situations. For example, an untrusted Git repository can have a submodule with shell metacharacters in a user name or host name.

First published (updated )
Severity
5.5
EPSS
0.04%
Race Condition
AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

sched/membarrier: reduce the ability to hammer on sysmembarrier

On some systems, sysmembarrier can be very expensive, causing overall slowdowns for everything. So put a lock on the path in order to serialize the accesses to prevent the ability for this to be called at too high of a frequency and saturate the machine.

1 / 7
Source: NVD
First published (updated )
Severity
4.1
AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

CVE-2023-5981 A vulnerability was found that the response times to malformed ciphertexts in RSA-PSK ClientKeyExchange differ from response times of ciphertexts with correct PKCS#1 v1.5 padding. CVE-2024-0553 A vulnerability was found in GnuTLS. The response times to malformed ciphertexts in RSA-PSK ClientKeyExchange differ from the response times of ciphertexts with correct PKCS#1 v1.5 padding. This issue may allow a remote attacker to perform a timing side-channel attack in the RSA-PSK key exchange, potentially leading to the leakage of sensitive data. CVE-2024-0553 is designated as an incomplete resolution for CVE-2023-5981.

First published (updated )
Severity
5.3
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Issue summary: Generating excessively long X9.42 DH keys or checking excessively long X9.42 DH keys or parameters may be very slow. Impact summary: Applications that use the functions DHgeneratekey() to generate an X9.42 DH key may experience long delays. Likewise, applications that use DHcheckpubkey(), DHcheckpubkeyex() or EVPPKEYpubliccheck() to check an X9.42 DH key or X9.42 DH parameters may experience long delays. Where the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained from an untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service. While DHcheck() performs all the necessary checks (as of CVE-2023-3817), DHcheckpubkey() doesn't make any of these checks, and is therefore vulnerable for excessively large P and Q parameters. Likewise, while DHgeneratekey() performs a check for an excessively large P, it doesn't check for an excessively large Q. An application that calls DHgeneratekey() or DHcheckpubkey() and supplies a key or parameters obtained from an untrusted source could be vulnerable to a Denial of Service attack. DHgeneratekey() and DHcheckpubkey() are also called by a number of other OpenSSL functions. An application calling any of those other functions may similarly be affected. The other functions affected by this are DHcheckpubkeyex(), EVPPKEYpubliccheck(), and EVPPKEYgenerate(). Also vulnerable are the OpenSSL pkey command line application when using the "-pubcheck" option, as well as the OpenSSL genpkey command line application. The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue. The OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this issue.

First published (updated )
Severity
6.5
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

cURL libcurl could allow a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions, caused by a mixed case flaw when curl is built without PSL support. By sending a specially crafted request, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to allow a HTTP server to set "super cookies" in curl.

1 / 5
Source: IBM
First published (updated )
Severity
5.9
EPSS
0.06%
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

A vulnerability was found that the response times to malformed ciphertexts in RSA-PSK ClientKeyExchange differ from response times of ciphertexts with correct PKCS#1 v1.5 padding.

1 / 5
Source: Ubuntu
First published (updated )
Severity
5.3
EPSS
0.13%
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Excessive time spent in DH check / generation with large Q parameter value

1 / 6
Source: Microsoft
First published (updated )
Severity
5.3
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L/E:F/RL:W/RC:C

The HTTP/2 protocol allows a denial of service (server resource consumption) because request cancellation can reset many streams quickly, as exploited in the wild in August through October 2023. (CVE-2023-44487 also known as HTTP/2 Rapid Reset Attack)

First published (updated )
Severity
5.9
AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

A timing based side channel exists in the OpenSSL RSA Decryption implementation which could be sufficient to recover a plaintext across a network in a Bleichenbacher style attack. To achieve a successful decryption an attacker would have to be able to send a very large number of trial messages for decryption. The vulnerability affects all RSA padding modes: PKCS#1 v1.5, RSA-OEAP and RSASVE. For example, in a TLS connection, RSA is commonly used by a client to send an encrypted pre-master secret to the server. An attacker that had observed a genuine connection between a client and a server could use this flaw to send trial messages to the server and record the time taken to process them. After a sufficiently large number of messages the attacker could recover the pre-master secret used for the original connection and thus be able to decrypt the application data sent over that connection. (CVE-2022-4304 )

First published (updated )

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203