Where
-Infinity
0
Severity
9.3
CRLF Injection, Command Injection
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Nodemailer before 8.0.4 is vulnerable to SMTP command injection through the unsanitized envelope.size parameter. When an application passes a custom envelope object with a size property containing CRLF characters to sendMail(), the value is concatenated into the SMTP MAIL FROM command (as SIZE=...) without sanitization, allowing injection of arbitrary SMTP commands such as RCPT TO to silently add attacker-controlled recipients. Exploitation requires the application to expose the envelope size to attacker-controlled input, as Nodemailer does not include size in the default auto-constructed envelope.

First published (updated )
Severity
8.3
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N

Nodemailer before 8.0.8 disables TLS certificate verification in lib/fetch/index.js through rejectUnauthorized: false, allowing attackers to intercept OAuth2 token requests. Attackers in a machine-in-the-middle position can capture OAuth client secrets, refresh tokens, and access tokens transmitted over compromised HTTPS connections.

First published (updated )
Severity
7.1
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N

nodemailer before 9.0.1 fails to apply disableFileAccess and disableUrlAccess flags to message-level raw option, allowing authenticated attackers to read arbitrary files or perform server-side request forgery by supplying path or href properties. Attackers can exploit this by crafting raw messages with file paths or URLs that bypass the intended sandbox, with fetched content delivered in the outgoing message to attacker-controlled recipients.

First published (updated )
Severity
5.3
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

Nodemailer before 8.0.9 fails to enforce disableFileAccess and disableUrlAccess options during message normalization in jsonTransport. Attackers can read local files or fetch URLs by supplying path or href values in message content fields, bypassing intended access controls.

First published (updated )
Severity
5.3
CRLF Injection
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

Nodemailer before 8.0.9 fails to sanitize carriage return and line feed characters in list comment fields, allowing attackers to inject arbitrary message headers. An attacker with control over list..comment parameters can inject CRLF sequences to create additional headers in generated RFC822 messages, altering mail client behavior and message semantics.

First published (updated )
Severity
6.9
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

nodemailer before 6.9.9 contains a regular expression denial of service vulnerability in email parsing when attachDataUrls parameter is set or processing embedded file attachments. Attackers can send specially crafted emails with malicious data URLs or embedded attachments to cause the event loop to hang and deny service.

First published (updated )
Severity
7.5
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

A vulnerability was identified in the email parsing library due to improper handling of specially formatted recipient email addresses. An attacker can exploit this flaw by crafting a recipient address that embeds an external address within quotes. This causes the application to misdirect the email to the attacker's external address instead of the intended internal recipient. This could lead to a significant data leak of sensitive information and allow an attacker to bypass security filters and access controls.

1 / 2
Source: MITRE
First published (updated )
Severity
7.5
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Summary A DoS can occur that immediately halts the system due to the use of an unsafe function.

Details According to RFC 5322, nested group structures (a group inside another group) are not allowed. Therefore, in lib/addressparser/index.js, the email address parser performs flattening when nested groups appear, since such input is likely to be abnormal. (If the address is valid, it is added as-is.) In other words, the parser flattens all nested groups and inserts them into the final group list. However, the code implemented for this flattening process can be exploited by malicious input and triggers DoS

RFC 5322 uses a colon (:) to define a group, and commas (,) are used to separate members within a group. At the following location in lib/addressparser/index.js:

https://github.com/nodemailer/nodemailer/blob/master/lib/addressparser/index.js#L90

there is code that performs this flattening. The issue occurs when the email address parser attempts to process the following kind of malicious address header:

g0: g1: g2: g3: ... gN: victim;

Because no recursion depth limit is enforced, the parser repeatedly invokes itself in the pattern addressparser → handleAddress → addressparser → ... for each nested group. As a result, when an attacker sends a header containing many colons, Nodemailer enters infinite recursion, eventually throwing Maximum call stack size exceeded and causing the process to terminate immediately. Due to the structure of this behavior, no authentication is required, and a single request is enough to shut down the service.

The problematic code section is as follows: js if (isGroup) { ... if (data.group.length) { let parsedGroup = addressparser(data.group.join(',')); // <- boom! parsedGroup.forEach(member => { if (member.group) { groupMembers = groupMembers.concat(member.group); } else { groupMembers.push(member); } }); } } data.group is expected to contain members separated by commas, but in the attacker’s payload the group contains colon (:) tokens. Because of this, the parser repeatedly triggers recursive calls for each colon, proportional to their number.

PoC

const nodemailer = require('nodemailer');

function buildDeepGroup(depth) { let parts = []; for (let i = 0; i < depth; i++) { parts.push(g${i}:); } return parts.join(' ') + ' user;'; }

const DEPTH = 3000; // <- control depth const toHeader = buildDeepGroup(DEPTH); console.log('to header length:', toHeader.length);

const transporter = nodemailer.createTransport({ streamTransport: true, buffer: true, newline: 'unix' });

console.log('parsing start');

transporter.sendMail( { from: 'test', to: toHeader, subject: 'test', text: 'test' }, (err, info) => { if (err) { console.error('error:', err); } else { console.log('finished :', info && info.envelope); } } ); As a result, when the colon is repeated beyond a certain threshold, the Node.js process terminates immediately.

Impact The attacker can achieve the following:

1. Force an immediate crash of any server/service that uses Nodemailer 2. Kill the backend process with a single web request 3. In environments using PM2/Forever, trigger a continuous restart loop, causing severe resource exhaustion”

1 / 2
Source: Red Hat
First published (updated )
Severity
4

Summary A DoS can occur that immediately halts the system due to the use of an unsafe function.

Details According to RFC 5322, nested group structures (a group inside another group) are not allowed. Therefore, in lib/addressparser/index.js, the email address parser performs flattening when nested groups appear, since such input is likely to be abnormal. (If the address is valid, it is added as-is.) In other words, the parser flattens all nested groups and inserts them into the final group list. However, the code implemented for this flattening process can be exploited by malicious input and triggers DoS

RFC 5322 uses a colon (:) to define a group, and commas (,) are used to separate members within a group. At the following location in lib/addressparser/index.js:

https://github.com/nodemailer/nodemailer/blob/master/lib/addressparser/index.js#L90

there is code that performs this flattening. The issue occurs when the email address parser attempts to process the following kind of malicious address header:

g0: g1: g2: g3: ... gN: victim;

Because no recursion depth limit is enforced, the parser repeatedly invokes itself in the pattern addressparser → handleAddress → addressparser → ... for each nested group. As a result, when an attacker sends a header containing many colons, Nodemailer enters infinite recursion, eventually throwing Maximum call stack size exceeded and causing the process to terminate immediately. Due to the structure of this behavior, no authentication is required, and a single request is enough to shut down the service.

The problematic code section is as follows: js if (isGroup) { ... if (data.group.length) { let parsedGroup = addressparser(data.group.join(',')); // <- boom! parsedGroup.forEach(member => { if (member.group) { groupMembers = groupMembers.concat(member.group); } else { groupMembers.push(member); } }); } } data.group is expected to contain members separated by commas, but in the attacker’s payload the group contains colon (:) tokens. Because of this, the parser repeatedly triggers recursive calls for each colon, proportional to their number.

PoC

const nodemailer = require('nodemailer');

function buildDeepGroup(depth) { let parts = []; for (let i = 0; i < depth; i++) { parts.push(g${i}:); } return parts.join(' ') + ' user;'; }

const DEPTH = 3000; // <- control depth const toHeader = buildDeepGroup(DEPTH); console.log('to header length:', toHeader.length);

const transporter = nodemailer.createTransport({ streamTransport: true, buffer: true, newline: 'unix' });

console.log('parsing start');

transporter.sendMail( { from: 'test', to: toHeader, subject: 'test', text: 'test' }, (err, info) => { if (err) { console.error('error:', err); } else { console.log('finished :', info && info.envelope); } } ); As a result, when the colon is repeated beyond a certain threshold, the Node.js process terminates immediately.

Impact The attacker can achieve the following:

1. Force an immediate crash of any server/service that uses Nodemailer 2. Kill the backend process with a single web request 3. In environments using PM2/Forever, trigger a continuous restart loop, causing severe resource exhaustion”

First published (updated )

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203