Checksum bypass for golang.org/fips140 in cmd/go

Enforce a recursion limit in Unmarshal to prevent stack exhaustion when parsing deeply-nested, recursive structures.

Decoding a maliciously-crafted MIME header containing many invalid encoded-words can consume excessive CPU.

HTTP/2 server memory exhaustion due to Trailer headers in net/http

A malicious HTTP/2 peer can cause excessive CPU consumption in the client or server by opening a large number of streams and then sending many small SETTINGS frames containing SETTINGSINITIALWINDOWSIZE values.

Hello,

CERT/CC published three vulnerability notes on 13 and 14 October 2026 about how open-source TLS/X.509 libraries enforce Name Constraints (RFC 5280 section 4.2.1.10). I reported the findings. This is a summary of public fixes and statuses; it does not announce new CVEs.

https://kb.cert.org/vuls/id/573195 https://kb.cert.org/vuls/id/948176 https://kb.cert.org/vuls/id/410595

The differences fall into four areas: DNS-name comparison (RFC 5280 requires case-insensitive matching), IP addresses (the RFC does not say whether IPv4-mapped IPv6 should be treated as IPv4), URI-authority parsing, and wildcards (the RFC does not define wildcard SAN semantics).

Fixed or merged:

pyca/cryptography CVE-2026-34073, fixed in 46.0.6. DNS constraints were checked against the certificate's SANs but not against the requested peer name. GHSA-m959-cc7f-wv43 rustls/webpki wildcards under permitted subtrees: CVE-2026-93601, fixed in 0.103.12 / 0.104.0-alpha.6 (GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh). Unsupported URI constraints were accepted: CVE-2026-93600, first fix in 0.103.12 / 0.104.0-alpha.6, excludedSubtrees case completed in 0.103.13 / 0.104.0-alpha.7 (GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5). GnuTLS CVE-2026-3833, fixed in 3.8.13. DNS names and the domain part of rfc822Name constraints compared case-sensitively. Independently co-reported. wolfSSL CVE-2026-5263, fixed in 5.9.1: URI constraints parsed but not enforced. Fragment wildcards (e.g. foo.com): PR 9991, in 5.9.1. Note: VU#948176 cites CVE-2026-3547 for the URI report; that CVE record describes an ALPN parsing issue. AWS-LC wildcard Common Name fallback fixed in 1.71.0 / aws-lc-sys 0.39.0 (GHSA-3jrg-j22w-mpmc, GHSA-394x-vwmw-crm3). The same advisory covers Unicode CN; VU#948176 lists that report as still under coordination. Go crypto/x509 CVE-2026-33810, fixed in Go 1.26.2 (GO-2026-4866, co-credited): case handling in wildcard parent-constraint lookup. OpenSSL URI authority: the userinfo scan for @ ran past /, ? or #. PR #30319; OpenSSL confirmed on 2026-09-10 that it is in all then-supported versions. BoringSSL VU#410595.8 (wildcard vs excluded host) and .12 (trailing-dot DNS names) fixed upstream in commit 5774eca (2026-03-04), legacy crypto/x509 path.

Open, disputed or declined (per the notes):

Go two reports in triage; IPv4-mapped IPv6 report not accepted as meeting the security bar OpenSSL userinfo-colon report in triage BoringSSL .9 accepted (upstream change b84dc60, 2026-05-05), .10 disputed, .11 declined Mozilla NSS IP-address report under coordination LibreSSL wildcard report under coordination s2n-tls Common Name fallback report in triage Mbed TLS non-critical Name Constraints not enforced in the reported configuration; vendor treats support as a feature request, reporter's concern disputed

Conditions, according to CERT/CC: an attacker needs a trusted signature over chosen certificate fields, an affected validation path must be reachable, and the application must use the accepted name for authorization. The notes do not report exploitation. Using one of these libraries does not by itself mean a product reaches an affected path.

No test vectors are published for anything not fixed.

Per-finding status with dated sources: https://paperlock.org/findings/

Regards, Oleh Konko 1seal - https://1seal.org/research/

To prevent unexpected untrusted code execution, the Visual Studio Code Go extension is now disabled in Restricted Mode.

Double flow control refund on HTTP/2 server streams in net/http

When an HTTP server handler sends a 2xx response to an HTTP/1 CONNECT request and returns without hijacking the connection, the server improperly continues to read and serve requests from the connection. Since a 2xx response to an HTTP/1 CONNECT converts the connection into a tunnel, the server should not treat the connection as continuing to contain HTTP. The impact of this misbehavior is mostly limited to potential request smuggling, where an intermediate proxy considers the data on the connection to be tunneled and the server considers it to be HTTP.

When parsing a Range header containing a large number of small ranges, FileServer(FS), ServeContent, and ServeFile(FS) can consume an excessive amount of CPU.

Case-sensitive excludedSubtrees name constraints cause Auth Bypass in crypto/x509

When verifying a certificate chain containing excluded DNS constraints, these constraints are not correctly applied to wildcard DNS SANs which use a different case than the constraint. This only affects validation of otherwise trusted certificate chains, issued by a root CA in the VerifyOptions.Roots CertPool, or in the system certificate pool.

Pathological inputs could cause DoS through consumePhrase when parsing an email address according to RFC 5322.

When using LookupCNAME with the cgo DNS resolver, a very long CNAME response can trigger a double-free of C memory and a crash.

(x509.Certificate).VerifyHostname previously called matchHostnames in a loop over all DNS Subject Alternative Name (SAN) entries. This caused strings.Split(host, ".") to execute repeatedly on the same input hostname. With a large DNS SAN list, verification costs scaled quadratically based on the number of SAN entries multiplied by the hostname's label count. Because x509.Verify validates hostnames before building the certificate chain, this overhead occurred even for untrusted certificates.

url.Parse insufficiently validated the host/authority component and accepted some invalid URLs.

url.Parse insufficiently validated the host/authority component and accepted some invalid URLs.

If one side of the TLS connection sends multiple key update messages post-handshake in a single record, the connection can deadlock, causing uncontrolled consumption of resources. This can lead to a denial of service. This only affects TLS 1.3.

During chain building, the amount of work that is done is not correctly limited when a large number of intermediate certificates are passed in VerifyOptions.Intermediates, which can lead to a denial of service. This affects both direct users of crypto/x509 and users of crypto/tls.

During chain building, the amount of work that is done is not correctly limited when a large number of intermediate certificates are passed in VerifyOptions.Intermediates, which can lead to a denial of service. This affects both direct users of crypto/x509 and users of crypto/tls.

Inefficient policy validation in crypto/x509

Inconsistent handling of OCREATE|OEXCL on Unix and Windows in os in syscall

SSH servers parsing GSSAPI authentication requests do not validate the number of mechanisms specified in the request, allowing an attacker to cause unbounded memory consumption.

During the TLS 1.3 handshake if multiple messages are sent in records that span encryption level boundaries (for instance the Client Hello and Encrypted Extensions messages), the subsequent messages may be processed before the encryption level changes. This can cause some minor information disclosure if a network-local attacker can inject messages during the handshake.

Last updated 7 October 2026

Last updated 7 October 2026

Bypass of meta content URL escaping causes XSS in html/template

ReverseProxy can forward queries containing parameters not visible to Rewrite functions. When used with a Rewrite function, or a Director function which parses query parameters, ReverseProxy sanitizes the forwarded request to remove query parameters which are not parsed by url.ParseQuery. ReverseProxy does not take ParseQuery's limit on the total number of query parameters (controlled by GODEBUG=urlmaxqueryparams=N) into account. This can permit ReverseProxy to forward a request containing a query parameter that is not visible to the Rewrite function. For example, the query "a1=x&a2=x&...&a10000=x&hidden=y" can forward the parameter "hidden=y" while hiding it from the proxy's Rewrite function.

Binaries built with golang-1.21.13-3.el94 and golang-1.21.13-2.module+el8.10.0+22329+6cd5c9c6 may intermittently return a zeroed buffer from (boringHMAC).Sum() in FIPS mode due to an uninitialized buffer length variable in the CGO bindings. This bug occurs randomly based on the stack layout at the time of the function call. It is not vulnerable to eg. buffer overflow attack because the underlying openssl routine checks the bounds of the buffer before writing to it. However, it may be possible to force a false positive match between non-equal hashes when comparing a trusted computed hmac sum to an untrusted input sum if an attacker is able to send a zeroed buffer in place of a pre-computed sum. It is also possible to force a derived key to be all zeros instead of an unpredictable value. This may have follow-on implications for the Go TLS stack.

On Unix systems, opening a file in an os.Root improperly follows symlinks to locations outside of the Root when the final path component of the a path is a symbolic link and the path ends in /. For example, 'root.Open("symlink/")' will open "symlink" even when "symlink" is a symbolic link pointing outside of the root.