In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

nfsd: clear aclaccess/acldefault after releasing them

If getting acldefault fails, aclaccess and acldefault will be released simultaneously. However, aclaccess will still retain a pointer pointing to the released posixacl, which will trigger a WARNING in nfs3svcreleasegetacl like this:

------------[ cut here ]------------ refcountt: underflow; use-after-free. WARNING: CPU: 26 PID: 3199 at lib/refcount.c:28 refcountwarnsaturate+0xb5/0x170 Modules linked in: CPU: 26 UID: 0 PID: 3199 Comm: nfsd Not tainted 6.12.0-rc6-00079-g04ae226af01f-dirty #8 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.1-2.fc37 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:refcountwarnsaturate+0xb5/0x170 Code: cc cc 0f b6 1d b3 20 a5 03 80 fb 01 0f 87 65 48 d8 00 83 e3 01 75 e4 48 c7 c7 c0 3b 9b 85 c6 05 97 20 a5 03 01 e8 fb 3e 30 ff <0f> 0b eb cd 0f b6 1d 8a3 RSP: 0018:ffffc90008637cd8 EFLAGS: 00010282 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffffffff83904fde RDX: dffffc0000000000 RSI: 0000000000000008 RDI: ffff88871ed36380 RBP: ffff888158beeb40 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: fffff520010c6f56 R10: ffffc90008637ab7 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 0000000000000001 R13: ffff888140e77400 R14: ffff888140e77408 R15: ffffffff858b42c0 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88871ed00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000562384d32158 CR3: 000000055cc6a000 CR4: 00000000000006f0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK> ? refcountwarnsaturate+0xb5/0x170 ? warn+0xa5/0x140 ? refcountwarnsaturate+0xb5/0x170 ? reportbug+0x1b1/0x1e0 ? handlebug+0x53/0xa0 ? excinvalidop+0x17/0x40 ? asmexcinvalidop+0x1a/0x20 ? ticknohztickstopped+0x1e/0x40 ? refcountwarnsaturate+0xb5/0x170 ? refcountwarnsaturate+0xb5/0x170 nfs3svcreleasegetacl+0xc9/0xe0 svcprocesscommon+0x5db/0xb60 ? pfxsvcprocesscommon+0x10/0x10 ? rcureadunlock+0x69/0xa0 ? pfxnfsddispatch+0x10/0x10 ? svcxprtreceived+0xa1/0x120 ? xdrinitdecode+0x11d/0x190 svcprocess+0x2a7/0x330 svchandlexprt+0x69d/0x940 svcrecv+0x180/0x2d0 nfsd+0x168/0x200 ? pfxnfsd+0x10/0x10 kthread+0x1a2/0x1e0 ? kthread+0xf4/0x1e0 ? pfxkthread+0x10/0x10 retfromfork+0x34/0x60 ? pfxkthread+0x10/0x10 retfromforkasm+0x1a/0x30 </TASK> Kernel panic - not syncing: kernel: paniconwarn set ...

Clear aclaccess/acldefault after posixaclrelease is called to prevent UAF from being triggered.

Issue summary: Calling the OpenSSL API function SSLselectnextproto with an empty supported client protocols buffer may cause a crash or memory contents to be sent to the peer.

gio/gsocks4aproxy.c in GNOME GLib before 2.82.1 has an off-by-one error and resultant buffer overflow because SOCKS4CONNMSGLEN is not sufficient for a trailing '\0' character.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net/mlx5: Properly link new fs rules into the tree

Previously, addrulefg would only add newly created rules from the handle into the tree when they had a refcount of 1. On the other hand, createflowhandle tries hard to find and reference already existing identical rules instead of creating new ones.

These two behaviors can result in a situation where createflowhandle 1) creates a new rule and references it, then 2) in a subsequent step during the same handle creation references it again, resulting in a rule with a refcount of 2 that is not linked into the tree, will have a NULL parent and root and will result in a crash when the flow group is deleted because delswhwrule, invoked on rule deletion, assumes node->parent is != NULL.

This happened in the wild, due to another bug related to incorrect handling of duplicate pktreformat ids, which lead to the code in createflowhandle incorrectly referencing a just-added rule in the same flow handle, resulting in the problem described above. Full details are at [1].

This patch changes addrulefg to add new rules without parents into the tree, properly initializing them and avoiding the crash. This makes it more consistent with how rules are added to an FTE in createflowhandle.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

wifi: iwlwifi: dbg-tlv: ensure NUL termination

The iwlfwinidebuginfotlv is used as a string, so we must ensure the string is terminated correctly before using it.

An issue was discovered in drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igbmain.c in the IGB driver in the Linux kernel before 6.5.3. A buffer size may not be adequate for frames larger than the MTU.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

nfsd: fix heap overflow in NFSv4.0 LOCK replay cache

The NFSv4.0 replay cache uses a fixed 112-byte inline buffer (rpibuf[NFSD4REPLAYISIZE]) to store encoded operation responses. This size was calculated based on OPEN responses and does not account for LOCK denied responses, which include the conflicting lock owner as a variable-length field up to 1024 bytes (NFS4OPAQUELIMIT).

When a LOCK operation is denied due to a conflict with an existing lock that has a large owner, nfsd4encodeoperation() copies the full encoded response into the undersized replay buffer via readbytesfromxdrbuf() with no bounds check. This results in a slab-out-of-bounds write of up to 944 bytes past the end of the buffer, corrupting adjacent heap memory.

This can be triggered remotely by an unauthenticated attacker with two cooperating NFSv4.0 clients: one sets a lock with a large owner string, then the other requests a conflicting lock to provoke the denial.

We could fix this by increasing NFSD4REPLAYISIZE to allow for a full opaque, but that would increase the size of every stateowner, when most lockowners are not that large.

Instead, fix this by checking the encoded response length against NFSD4REPLAYISIZE before copying into the replay buffer. If the response is too large, set rpbuflen to 0 to skip caching the replay payload. The status is still cached, and the client already received the correct response on the original request.

Calling the scanf family of functions with a %mc (malloc'd character match) in the GNU C Library version 2.7 to version 2.43 with a format width specifier with an explicit width greater than 1024 could result in a one byte heap buffer overflow.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

A stack buffer overflow may lead to a crash, causing Denial of Service, or potentially remote code execution.

When parsing CMS AuthEnvelopedData structures that use AEAD ciphers such as AES-GCM, the IV (Initialization Vector) encoded in the ASN.1 parameters is copied into a fixed-size stack buffer without verifying that its length fits the destination. An attacker can supply a crafted CMS message with an oversized IV, causing a stack-based out-of-bounds write before any authentication or tag verification occurs.

Applications and services that parse untrusted CMS or PKCS#7 content using AEAD ciphers (e.g., S/MIME AuthEnvelopedData with AES-GCM) are vulnerable. Because the overflow occurs prior to authentication, no valid key material is required to trigger it. While exploitability to remote code execution depends on platform and toolchain mitigations, the stack-based write primitive represents a severe risk.

The FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the CMS implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.

OpenSSL 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3 and 3.0 are vulnerable to this issue.

OpenSSL 1.1.1 and 1.0.2 are not affected by this issue.

OpenSSL 3.6 users should upgrade to OpenSSL 3.6.1.

OpenSSL 3.5 users should upgrade to OpenSSL 3.5.5.

OpenSSL 3.4 users should upgrade to OpenSSL 3.4.4.

OpenSSL 3.3 users should upgrade to OpenSSL 3.3.6.

OpenSSL 3.0 users should upgrade to OpenSSL 3.0.19.

An issue was discovered in libexpat before 2.6.3. nextScaffoldPart in xmlparse.c can have an integer overflow for mgroupSize on 32-bit platforms (where UINTMAX equals SIZEMAX).

An issue was discovered in libexpat before 2.6.3. dtdCopy in xmlparse.c can have an integer overflow for nDefaultAtts on 32-bit platforms (where UINTMAX equals SIZEMAX).

Accounts. A logic issue was addressed with improved file handling.

Airport. A permissions issue was addressed with improved redaction of sensitive information.

IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a buffer overflow.

IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2.2, and 12.1 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary SQL commands due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an SQL command.

IBM DataPower Gateway 10.5.0.0 through 10.5.0.22, 10.6.1 through 10.6.6, 10.6.0.0 through 10.6.0.10, and 11.0.0.0 through 11.0.0.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to an out-of-bounds write in the RFC2047 encoded-word parser.

IBM DataPower Gateway 10.5.0.0 through 10.5.0.22, 10.6.1 through 10.6.6, 10.6.0.0 through 10.6.0.10, and 11.0.0.0 through 11.0.0.2 is vulnerable to a buffer overflow, caused by improper bounds checking. A local user could overflow the buffer and execute arbitrary code on the system.

IBM DataPower Gateway 10.5.0.0 through 10.5.0.22, 10.6.1 through 10.6.6, 10.6.0.0 through 10.6.0.10, and 11.0.0.0 through 11.0.0.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to an out-of-bounds write.

IBM DataPower Gateway 10.5.0.0 through 10.5.0.22, 10.6.1 through 10.6.6, 10.6.0.0 through 10.6.0.10, and 11.0.0.0 through 11.0.0.2 is vulnerable to a heap-based buffer overflow, caused by improper bounds checking. An unauthenticated remote attacker could overflow the buffer and execute arbitrary code on the system.

IBM DataPower Gateway 10.5.0.0 through 10.5.0.22, 10.6.1 through 10.6.6, 10.6.0.0 through 10.6.0.10, and 11.0.0.0 through 11.0.0.2 could allow a remote attacker to obtain administrative access due to failure to reject empty passwords during LDAP authentication.

DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data could allow a remote authenticated attacker to cause a denial of service due to a path traversal vulnerability.

DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an exposure of sensitive information to an unauthorized actor.

DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper validation of pathname during a path traversal.

IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information or execute arbitrary code on the system due to improper data sanitization by the HTTP Server Administration web application.

Accessibility. A privacy issue was addressed with improved private data redaction for log entries.

A vulnerability in input validation exists in curl <8.0 during communication using the TELNET protocol may allow an attacker to pass on maliciously crafted user name and "telnet options" during server negotiation. The lack of proper input scrubbing allows an attacker to send content or perform option negotiation without the application's intent. This vulnerability could be exploited if an application allows user input thereby enabling attackers to execute arbitrary code on the system.

A cleartext transmission of sensitive information vulnerability exists in curl <v7.88.0 that could cause HSTS functionality fail when multiple URLs are requested serially. Using its HSTS support, curl can be instructed to use HTTPS instead of usingan insecure clear-text HTTP step even when HTTP is provided in the URL. ThisHSTS mechanism would however surprisingly be ignored by subsequent transferswhen done on the same command line because the state would not be properlycarried on.

A buffer-underflow vulnerability exists in GLib’s GVariant parser, specifically within bytestringparse() and stringparse(). The parser uses signed 32-bit integers (gint) as loop indices (i and j). When extremely large strings are parsed, these counters overflow into negative values, causing the parser to write to memory before the start of the allocated buffer (str[j++]). This results in a classic out-of-bounds write condition. Because GVariant parsing is often performed on attacker-influenced data, a remote attacker can trigger heap corruption, causing a crash or potentially achieving code execution. This flaw has been confirmed by maintainers and patched upstream.

IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a buffer overflow.