Where
-Infinity
0
Severity
7.5
Use After Free, SQL Injection
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

SQLite is vulnerable to a denial of service, caused by a use-after-free in resetAccumulator in select.c. By sending a specially crafted request, a remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause a denial of service.

1 / 2
First published (updated )
Severity
8.8
Buffer Overflow, Integer Overflow
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

An issue was discovered in International Components for Unicode (ICU) for C/C++ through 66.1. An integer overflow, leading to a heap-based buffer overflow, exists in the UnicodeString::doAppend() function in common/unistr.cpp.

1 / 4
Source: Launchpad
First published (updated )
Severity
7.5
SQL Injection
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

An unspecified error in selectExpander in select.c in SQLite has an unknown impact and attack vector.

1 / 4
Source: IBM
First published (updated )
Severity
7.5
SQL Injection
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

ext/misc/zipfile.c in SQLite 3.30.1 mishandles certain uses of INSERT INTO in situations involving embedded '\0' characters in filenames, leading to a memory-management error that can be detected by (for example) valgrind.

1 / 4
Source: Launchpad
First published (updated )
Severity
7.5
SQL Injection, Null Pointer Dereference
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Last updated 25 August 2025

1 / 4
Source: Ubuntu
First published (updated )
Severity
5.3
SQL Injection
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Last updated 25 August 2025

1 / 4
Source: Ubuntu
First published (updated )
Severity
7.5
Null Pointer Dereference, SQL Injection
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

flattenSubquery in select.c in SQLite 3.30.1 mishandles certain uses of SELECT DISTINCT involving a LEFT JOIN in which the right-hand side is a view. This can cause a NULL pointer dereference (or incorrect results).

1 / 4
Source: Launchpad
First published (updated )
Severity
7.5
SQL Injection, Malicious File Upload
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Last updated 25 August 2025

1 / 4
Source: Ubuntu
First published (updated )
Severity
9.8
SQL Injection
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

lookupName in resolve.c in SQLite 3.30.1 omits bits from the colUsed bitmask in the case of a generated column, which allows attackers to cause a denial of service or possibly have unspecified other impact.

1 / 2
First published (updated )
Severity
5.5
SQL Injection
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

alter.c in SQLite through 3.30.1 allows attackers to trigger infinite recursion via certain types of self-referential views in conjunction with ALTER TABLE statements.

1 / 3
Source: Launchpad
First published (updated )
Severity
7.5
SQL Injection, Null Pointer Dereference
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

exprListAppendList in window.c in SQLite 3.30.1 allows attackers to trigger an invalid pointer dereference because constant integer values in ORDER BY clauses of window definitions are mishandled.

1 / 4
Source: Launchpad
First published (updated )
Severity
7.5
SQL Injection
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

An error during handling of CREATE TABLE and CREATE VIEW statements in SQLite has an unknown impact via a specially crafted table name.

1 / 4
Source: IBM
First published (updated )
Severity
9.8
SQL Injection
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

An unspecified error related to the mishandling of NOT NULL in an integritycheck PRAGMA command in pragma.c in SQLite has an unknown impact and attack vector.

1 / 2
Source: IBM
First published (updated )
Severity
7.8
Buffer Overflow
AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

A heap buffer overflow in the TFTP receiving code allows for DoS or arbitrary code execution in libcurl versions 7.19.4 through 7.64.1.

1 / 2
First published (updated )
Severity
7.5
SQL Injection
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Last updated 25 August 2025

1 / 4
Source: Ubuntu
First published (updated )
Severity
5.9
SQL Injection, Null Pointer Dereference
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

An unspecified error with the mishandling of pExpr->y.pTab in the sqlite3ExprCodeTarget function in expr.c in SQLite has an unknown impact and attack vector.

1 / 3
Source: IBM
First published (updated )
Severity
6.5
SQL Injection, Divide by Zero
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

In SQLite through 3.29.0 whereLoopAddBtreeIndex in sqlite3.c can crash a browser or other application because of missing validation of a sqlitestat1 sz field aka a "severe division by zero in the query planner."

1 / 5
Source: Microsoft
First published (updated )
Severity
7.5
Input Validation
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

An issue was discovered in Python through 2.7.16, 3.x through 3.5.7, 3.6.x through 3.6.9, and 3.7.x through 3.7.4. The email module wrongly parses email addresses that contain multiple @ characters. An application that uses the email module and implements some kind of checks on the From/To headers of a message could be tricked into accepting an email address that should be denied. An attack may be the same as in CVE-2019-11340; however, this CVE applies to Python more generally.

1 / 4
First published (updated )
Severity
8
XSS
AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

A flaw was found in springframework in versions prior to 5.0.16, 5.1.13, and 5.2.3. A reflected file download (RFD) attack is possible when a "Content-Disposition" header is set in response to where the filename attribute is derived from user supplied input. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality and integrity as well as system availability.

1 / 4
First published (updated )
Severity
7.5
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

A specially crafted sequence of HTTP/2 requests could trigger high CPU usage for several seconds. If a sufficient number of such requests were made on concurrent HTTP/2 connections, the server could become unresponsive.

Reference: https://tomcat.apache.org/security-8.html

1 / 4
Source: Red Hat
First published (updated )
Severity
7
AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

A deserialization flaw was discovered in Apache Tomcat's use of a FileStore. An attacker can exploit the flaw if all of the following are true: An attacker is able to control the contents and name of a file on the server. The server is configured to use the PersistenceManager with a FileStore. The PersistenceManager is configured with sessionAttributeValueClassNameFilter="null" (the default unless a SecurityManager is used) or a sufficiently lax filter to allow the attacker-provided object to be deserialized. The attacker knows the relative file path from the storage location used by FileStore to the file the attacker has control over. If all these conditions are true, the attacker can use a specifically crafted request to trigger Remote Code Execution through deserialization of the file under their control.

This flaw affects the following Tomcat versions: 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0-M4, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.34, 8.5.0 to 8.5.54, and 7.0.0 to 7.0.103.

Upstream commits:

Tomcat 10.0: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/commit/bb33048e3f9b4f2b70e4da2e6c4e34ca89023b1b Tomcat 9.0: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/commit/3aa8f28db7efb311cdd1b6fe15a9cd3b167a2222 Tomcat 8.5: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/commit/ec08af18d0f9ddca3f2d800ef66fe7fd20afef2f Tomcat 7.0: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/commit/53e30390943c18fca0c9e57dbcc14f1c623cfd06

1 / 5
Source: Red Hat
First published (updated )
Severity
4.8
XSS
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

A flaw was found in Apache Tomcat. The HTTP header parsing code used an approach to end-of-line (EOL) parsing that allowed some invalid HTTP headers to be parsed as valid. This led to the possibility of HTTP Request Smuggling if Tomcat was located behind a reverse proxy that incorrectly handled the invalid Transfer-Encoding header in a particular manner. The highest threat with this vulnerability is system availability.

1 / 5
First published (updated )
Severity
7.5
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Apache Tomcat could allow a local attacker to hijack a user's session. By using the FORM authentication function, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain access to another user's session.

1 / 5
Source: IBM
First published (updated )
Severity
7.4
AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

A privilege escalation flaw was found in Tomcat when the JMX Remote Lifecycle Listener was enabled. A local attacker without access to the Tomcat process or configuration files could be able to manipulate the RMI registry to perform a man-in-the-middle attack. The attacker could then capture user names and passwords used to access the JMX interface and gain complete control over the Tomcat instance.

1 / 5
First published (updated )
Severity
9.8
Code Injection, OS Command Injection, Command Injection
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

It was found that XStream could deserialize arbitrary user-supplied XML content, representing objects of any type. A remote attacker able to pass XML to XStream could use this flaw to perform a variety of attacks, including remote code execution in the context of the server running the XStream application.

1 / 4
First published (updated )
Severity
4.3
Input Validation
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

CVE-2018-20852 http.cookiejar.DefaultPolicy.domainreturnok in Lib/http/cookiejar.py in Python before 3.7.3 does not correctly validate the domain: it can be tricked into sending existing cookies to the wrong server. An attacker may abuse this flaw by using a server with a hostname that has another valid hostname as a suffix (e.g., pythonicexample.com to steal cookies for example.com). When a program uses http.cookiejar.DefaultPolicy and tries to do an HTTP connection to an attacker-controlled server, existing cookies can be leaked to the attacker. This affects 2.x through 2.7.16, 3.x before 3.4.10, 3.5.x before 3.5.7, 3.6.x before 3.6.9, and 3.7.x before 3.7.3. CVE-2014-4616 Array index error in the scanstring function in the json module in Python 2.7 through 3.5 and simplejson before 2.6.1 allows context-dependent attackers to read arbitrary process memory via a negative index value in the idx argument to the rawdecode function. CVE-2013-7040 Python 2.7 before 3.4 only uses the last eight bits of the prefix to randomize hash values, which causes it to compute hash values without restricting the ability to trigger hash collisions predictably and makes it easier for context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via crafted input to an application that maintains a hash table. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2012-1150.

1 / 5
Source: F5
First published (updated )
Severity
5.5
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Last updated 4 July 2026

1 / 5
Source: Ubuntu
First published (updated )
Severity
4.9
AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

"managed-keys" is a feature which allows a BIND resolver to automatically maintain the keys used by trust anchors which operators configure for use in DNSSEC validation. Due to an error in the managed-keys feature it is possible for a BIND server which uses managed-keys to exit due to an assertion failure if, during key rollover, a trust anchor's keys are replaced with keys which use an unsupported algorithm. Versions affected: BIND 9.9.0 -> 9.10.8-P1, 9.11.0 -> 9.11.5-P1, 9.12.0 -> 9.12.3-P1, and versions 9.9.3-S1 -> 9.11.5-S3 of BIND 9 Supported Preview Edition. Versions 9.13.0 -> 9.13.6 of the 9.13 development branch are also affected. Versions prior to BIND 9.9.0 have not been evaluated for vulnerability to CVE-2018-5745.

1 / 3
Source: MITRE
First published (updated )
Severity
9.8
AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L

Apache Tomcat could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code on the system, caused by a file read/inclusion vulnerability in the AJP connector. By sending a specially-crafted request, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to read web application files from a vulnerable server and upload malicious JavaServer Pages (JSP) code within a variety of file types and execute arbitrary code on the system.

Note: This vulnerability is known as Ghostcat.

1 / 5
Source: IBM
First published (updated )
Severity
4.8
XSS
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Apache Tomcat is vulnerable to HTTP request smuggling, caused by a flaw when handling unusual Transfer-Encoding HTTP header. By sending a specially-crafted request, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to poison the web cache, bypass web application firewall protection, and conduct XSS attacks.

1 / 3
Source: IBM
First published (updated )

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203